New Hampshire primaries

Border
January 8, 2008

January 8 — New Hampshire primaries

109 Responses to “New Hampshire primaries”

Pages: [11] 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Debbie Jane

IS it me or was McCain’s victory speech depressing? How can republicans expect to keep the White House with him on the ticket?

Mitt Romney “lost” acording to all the reports and he had a better more upbeat and positive speech.

We want the country to go in a positive and forward direction. McCain is the past and he is too negitive.

 
Comment by Dot

You guys don’t have a clue about what makes a woman tear up. Don’t assume that Hillary fabricated her teary eyes. It was a crack in her thick skin and gave us a glimpse of her personal side.

 
Comment by Nathan

I am not suprised that there are so many of you that bash Ron Paul.

The problem is you are using logical fallacies to do this.

Do not use Red Herrings; Do not use straw man arguments; Tell it like it is…

Oh wait… this is fox news

Ron Paul 2008!

 
Comment by marine01

top tier canidates only………I support Fox. I am not impressed with a man who still thinks of the US in isolationist terms……..no thanks
SUPPORT A TRUE CONSERVATIVE FRED THOMPSON OR DUNCAN HUNTER
all the rest are ghosts of christmas past………George Bush wannabees………….we do not need another one of those

 
Comment by Just Observing

Just observing here:

Ron Paul??? Doctors don’t have any business courses in med school and usually are airheads. I’ve worked for them. Hair brain ideas; no reality.

Fred Thompson is the most consistently conservative, but too old and too tired. His wife should run for something.

John McCain?? No, thanks. Again, way too elderly and out of shape. He deserves some respect for what he’s gone through, though.

Rudy??? Cute, but too liberal on social issues. No, thanks.

Romney–No evangelicals will vote for him and he’s kind of phony.

Huckabee–Please get your teeth fixed.

But anybody is better than Hilly and Billy again.

 
Comment by HaveSomeIntegrity!

There are 47 more states to go following tonight. If all candidates were allowed to participate, there might be a new “top-tier” candidate within as little as two weeks, or is that what you’re afraid of?

My personal vote goes to Hunter, whose qualifications, in my opinion, are superior to the other candidates and make him the natural choice for conservative voters.

While I advocate for Hunter, I think Paul deserves equal opportunity to express his views as the PEOPLE look to determine which candidate will best address their concerns for this great nation.

 
Comment by Phil

I would recommend everyone to check out Mitt Romney’s record (not what people say about his supposed flip-flops). The more I found out, the more I was surprised at how consistent he has been on the issues (including gay rights and gun control). The more people find out about him, the more they like him. He is the most competent manager I have ever seen in an election. It’s not just that he’s ran things, it’s how well he’s ran them and how often he’s taken large organizations that were failing (like the Olympics) and turned them around. It really is impressive.

 
Comment by MaryMac

I liked Fred Thompson in the debate. I am amazed at the views the voters in NH had afterwards. Fred is a very detailed candidate. Very much unlike any of the others. I hope he can stay in and become the nominee.

 
Comment by Mike40

Folks… it’s REALLY simple. Though Ron Paul is currently running as a Republican, he isn’t one, never has been one, and never will be one. He is a Libertarian. He won’t get the Republican nod as a candidate, and he’ll likely jump right back in as the libertarian candidate so stop griping about the primary. He’s only in there to much up the works and steal publicity. If the libertarians had more candidates, they could have libertarian debates. Heck, where’s Ralph Nader in the Democrat debates??? Are they excluding him?

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It