Paul, Hunter Force Leading GOP Candidates to Pay Attention

Border

While Congressmen Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter rank below the other Republican presidential candidates in national polls, they nonetheless hit on key issues for particular blocs and occasionally force the top tier to take notice.

The super-early, front-loaded primary calendar, combined with a mildly enthusiastic Republican base, has enabled these two boutique candidates to energize the field, said Mark Wrighton, politics professor at Millikin University in Illinois.

“We’re really sort of in uncharted territory here and we’re seeing some interesting things occur,” Wrighton said.

One of the unexpected, big moves in the race so far has been the catapult of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, from what was generally considered a darkhorse, second-tier position to frontrunner status in Iowa; he has become the most talked about Republican candidate in the field.

Paul has surprised everyone by attracting what many are saying is the largest grassroots movement since independent Ross Perot in 1992. The limited government, anti-war libertarian raised more than $19 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 and he has a legion of avid volunteers knocking door to door and blogging all over the country on his behalf.

While his chances for winning the nomination appear slim, Paul earned 9 percent of the vote in a Des Moines Register survey of likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers released Tuesday. An average of national polling puts him at 4.3 percent.

Meanwhile, Hunter may not have the the broad appeal of the current GOP frontrunners, but is certainly generating — and riding — the wave of Republican energy on issues like illegal immigration and border security.

Hunter, a California congressman, has forged his campaign on Republican anger at what he perceives is federal immobility on curbing illegal immigration, incentives that attract undocumented workers and their families here and so-called “sanctuary cities” that do not penalize or pursue illegal immigrants within their jurisdictions.

Hunter, who was chairman of the Armed Services Committee before Democrats took over the majority in the House of Representatives in 2007, is known primarily for successfully pushing through legislation for erecting a security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border. He’s been tough on the outsourcing of American business to foreigners and has been steadfast in this support of the war policy in Iraq.

But his star has been dimmed by the brighter, though in some ways, less purely conservative lights of the so-called “top tier.”

“I’ve known Duncan Hunter since 1980,” said John Gizzi, political editor of Human Events. “He’s one of the most decent people I know. He places ethics above everything else. He’s honorable to a fault.”

But with Hunter polling around 1 percent, Gizzi said the candidate might be looking toward other things.

“If there is a Republican president, (Hunter) would make an outstanding secretary of defense.”

Paul has not been so overshadowed. The 10-term congressman from Texas who was the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate in 1988, has never enjoyed so much national notoriety and support as he does now, mostly because he is the only Republican candidate who has articulated opposition to the war, independence from the GOP machine and a strict constructionist view of the Constitution.

“He’s surprising a lot of people with the buzz he’s getting,” said Sean Evans, a professor of politics at Union University in Tennessee. “There’s a strong libertarian streak in the Republican Party and he’s speaking to that. He’s speaking to a certain demographic that no one has been able to.”

During the GOP debates Paul, 72, offered push-back against the other candidates, particularly on Iraq. Rudy Giuliani, the frontrunner in national polls, was able to make headlines off Paul when he scolded him for suggesting that it was U.S. policy that led to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. But Paul didn’t back down and therein lies his appeal, said conservative political consultant Chuck Muth, also head of Citizen Outreach.

“He’s never worried about the Republican establishment, that’s for sure,” he said. “He means what he says. I think his personality has attracted so many people who may hadn’t heard of Ron Paul before this presidential campaign.”

629 Responses to “Paul, Hunter Force Leading GOP Candidates to Pay Attention”

Pages: « 63 62 61 60 59 [58] 57 56 55 54 531 » Show All

Comment by steve smith

keep Dr. Paul in the debaits ! The entire country needs to hear more form the likes of him !

 
Comment by evangeline

i am scared for my children and future grandchildren if the USA keeps going status-quo. WE NEED CHANGE and not just a little change…we need RON PAUL if future generations are hoping to be able to enjoy what was once a great USA. We need to simplify and reduce government. Personally, I am scared to have a nationnal iD card or a chip in me to watch my every move…and I am sad we are hated around the world because we interfere with other countries problems. Aren’t you?

RonPaul2008.com

Let’s save this country before it’s too late

 
Comment by tom oneill

I want to see Ron Paul and Dunkin Hunter in your forum—- I think you owe it to the people to have on everyone that have good ideas for this country–reconsider what you are doing here—–to put a gag on some is to put a gag on anyone else you decide should not be heard

 
Comment by Bruce Koerber

Our soldiers are sacrificing life, limb, family life, and possibly mental health every day and their favorite Presidential candidate is Ron Paul. Fox News disrepects them and their loved ones in favor of the neoconservative war mongers. Who is it that cares about our soldiers? Ron Paul cares about them and he cares about our country. He makes it clear to the U.S. citizens that we can stop the war-making gracefully or we will lose in disgrace when we go bankrupt.

Fox News spits in the face of those serving in the military by excluding Ron Paul, their favorite candidate, from the New Hampshire forum.

To claim that the format cannot be made to fit is ridiculous. I could do it with a small fraction of the resources at their disposal. If they are that inept their staff should be fired and replaced with others who are competent.

 
Comment by ralphy of america

The poor simpleton democrats think that change- any change- for the sake of change- is even remotely congruous to improvement of a situation. You don’t revolt except against evil which precludes by definition even allowing the evil dems to propose change. See, just like with drugs, booze and toxic waste, there is absolutely NO problem for which the answer is a democrat!! Besides- if you want change for the better- the thing to do is get rid of the god damned marxist pigs pretending to be americans calling themselves democrats. They have not been cleansed out of washington once since 1940. THAT would be a change that would improve all our lives, and all of USA.

 
Comment by mary leon/vista ca

I watch Fox News local and national exclusively. I, like so many others are wondering why Fox refers to the Ron Paul campaign with asides and a humorous tilt. I personally would like to see equal time for all serious candidates. I get the feeling that the media is afraid to present all the candidates, and this begs the question, “why”.
I think Fox would be well served by realizing that there are more than two parties. Their blatant disregard for this fact seems to be based on the fact that they are pandering to the lowest common denominator who wishes to be spoonfed their news, and that they don’t believe that a growing number of people are paying attention to people outside of the two parties.
As a regular viewer of supposedly “fair and balanced” it is beginning to be abundantly clear that you are not. I am hearing this from others who watch Fox as opposed to the MORE liberal news media, and I am not alone in wondering why you are not covering all the news.
Most of us don’t care one bit about drug addict mothers, and celebs. We want NEWS. We want REAL. We want unfiltered.

Don’t try to decide what we want to hear. Let us do our own filtering.
Thank you,
Mary Leon

 
Comment by Malcolm

Ron Paul is the only chance America has for true positive change. Even his ‘negative’ attributes and proposals are understandable and acceptable. VOTE RON PAUL 2008!

 
Comment by Mrs. T, Westlake Village, CA

Who made this decision to exclude Congressman Hunter and Paul? The decision stinks. Dr. Paul received more votes than Giuliani. Shame! Shame!! Shame!!! Brit, Chris, put them back in the debate NOW!!!.
Thanks.

 
Comment by Sean in W/PA

Why would Rudy be included in your debate but Congressmen Paul has been excluded ?????

Your jumping the gun invitiations have left you with hopefully a mouth full of crow.
Is it me or do you support certain candidates through interviews and clips on upcoming event commercials? You spent alot of time interviewing a 5th place finishing canidate while ignoring Dr. Paul beating one of your hopefulls.

 
Comment by Joe Slump

Let Paul be heard!

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It