Paul, Hunter Force Leading GOP Candidates to Pay Attention

Border

While Congressmen Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter rank below the other Republican presidential candidates in national polls, they nonetheless hit on key issues for particular blocs and occasionally force the top tier to take notice.

The super-early, front-loaded primary calendar, combined with a mildly enthusiastic Republican base, has enabled these two boutique candidates to energize the field, said Mark Wrighton, politics professor at Millikin University in Illinois.

“We’re really sort of in uncharted territory here and we’re seeing some interesting things occur,” Wrighton said.

One of the unexpected, big moves in the race so far has been the catapult of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, from what was generally considered a darkhorse, second-tier position to frontrunner status in Iowa; he has become the most talked about Republican candidate in the field.

Paul has surprised everyone by attracting what many are saying is the largest grassroots movement since independent Ross Perot in 1992. The limited government, anti-war libertarian raised more than $19 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 and he has a legion of avid volunteers knocking door to door and blogging all over the country on his behalf.

While his chances for winning the nomination appear slim, Paul earned 9 percent of the vote in a Des Moines Register survey of likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers released Tuesday. An average of national polling puts him at 4.3 percent.

Meanwhile, Hunter may not have the the broad appeal of the current GOP frontrunners, but is certainly generating — and riding — the wave of Republican energy on issues like illegal immigration and border security.

Hunter, a California congressman, has forged his campaign on Republican anger at what he perceives is federal immobility on curbing illegal immigration, incentives that attract undocumented workers and their families here and so-called “sanctuary cities” that do not penalize or pursue illegal immigrants within their jurisdictions.

Hunter, who was chairman of the Armed Services Committee before Democrats took over the majority in the House of Representatives in 2007, is known primarily for successfully pushing through legislation for erecting a security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border. He’s been tough on the outsourcing of American business to foreigners and has been steadfast in this support of the war policy in Iraq.

But his star has been dimmed by the brighter, though in some ways, less purely conservative lights of the so-called “top tier.”

“I’ve known Duncan Hunter since 1980,” said John Gizzi, political editor of Human Events. “He’s one of the most decent people I know. He places ethics above everything else. He’s honorable to a fault.”

But with Hunter polling around 1 percent, Gizzi said the candidate might be looking toward other things.

“If there is a Republican president, (Hunter) would make an outstanding secretary of defense.”

Paul has not been so overshadowed. The 10-term congressman from Texas who was the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate in 1988, has never enjoyed so much national notoriety and support as he does now, mostly because he is the only Republican candidate who has articulated opposition to the war, independence from the GOP machine and a strict constructionist view of the Constitution.

“He’s surprising a lot of people with the buzz he’s getting,” said Sean Evans, a professor of politics at Union University in Tennessee. “There’s a strong libertarian streak in the Republican Party and he’s speaking to that. He’s speaking to a certain demographic that no one has been able to.”

During the GOP debates Paul, 72, offered push-back against the other candidates, particularly on Iraq. Rudy Giuliani, the frontrunner in national polls, was able to make headlines off Paul when he scolded him for suggesting that it was U.S. policy that led to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. But Paul didn’t back down and therein lies his appeal, said conservative political consultant Chuck Muth, also head of Citizen Outreach.

“He’s never worried about the Republican establishment, that’s for sure,” he said. “He means what he says. I think his personality has attracted so many people who may hadn’t heard of Ron Paul before this presidential campaign.”

629 Responses to “Paul, Hunter Force Leading GOP Candidates to Pay Attention”

Pages: « 63 62 61 60 [59] 58 57 56 55 54 531 » Show All

Comment by Joan Bowyer

As a long-time, died in the wool Republican, I’m terribly disappointed in your coverage of this most critical 08 election. Having worked in Washington and witnessed the machinations of most of that “unholy tribe”, who profess to be Americans supporting the nations’ citizens, I’m sick and tired of having no representation. Congressman Duncan Hunter DESERVES your respect and attention and yet you have declined to invite him to speak. Why? He has served his country well, both on the battle field and in The Congress. Don’t you ever get tired of the hypocrites? Clinton, McCain, Edwards, Romney, etc., etc., to name a few. Heaven help us.
Too, it would have been very helpful had you included an “e-mail” message section to this site. I would have liked to send the above transcript and messages to others in my address book. If, I’ve missed something, please advise.

 
Comment by Gen

Ooops? Duncan Hunter wins 3rd place in the WY Caucus and Fox News didn’t even bother to invite him to the debate this weekend.

Duncan Hunter, 08.

 
Comment by Walter Moreland

fox news is the mouth piece of one world government and they are deathly afriad of a ron paul presidentcy

 
Comment by Dan S

Thanks for at least including Paul in an article…. but this doesn’t make you fair and balanced. All the other candidates except Paul and Hunter get to be seen firsthand by the American public in debate. While it’s nice there is an article with Paul in it, this is sill second hand information- an interpretation of the candidates. Let the voters have FIRST HAND information by including all candidates in the debate, especially at such a crucial time of the election period.

 
Comment by Michael R Johnson

I would like to see Ron Paul as president with Mike Huckabee as vice president, But, I would take a Mike Huckabee as president and Ron Paul as vice president.
these two men talk straight from the constitution and dont seem wishy washy like the others.
they talked about helth care like they were doctors and had a clue, and they smirked at Dr Paul, who is a doctor, and when Giuliani and Romney clashed Giuliani called New York his city.
Romney just stamers when he talks, and one turn off for me is the jabs back and forth between cadidates, that just doesnt appear to be thinking about the people, you dont see it happening from Ron Paul, and McCain, hes just going to keep spending all our money on a war, or over seas, no thanks McCain and another thing John McCain, in the debate when you were talking about serving your country and swore to defend America and being on a ship and whatever!!!,
why didnt you just say that you swore to uphold the constitution against enemies foriegn and domestic, it appears to that you went out of your way to leave that oath out, like some of our Judges do here in America. No McCain we dont need anymore war mongers like you in office.
its your responsibility to secure the border not the federal government, and you cant even do that. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT, MIKE HUCKABEE FOR VICE PRESIDENT

 
Comment by Joe

So why won’t you let Congressman Duncan Hunter in the debate. He actually has delegates after the Wyoming Caucus. Some of the other debate participants have no delegates. That doesn’t sound Fair & Balanced to me.

 
Comment by Brian Errigo

Ron Paul…..thats all i have to say. I say Ron Paul hosts his own rally outside of Fox News on the day of the debate.

 
Comment by Scott

Stiff-arm FOX NEWS for Stiff-arming Ron Paul. This foolishness makes not the slightest bit of sense. It is unjust and unfair and illogical. It only further validates Paul’s claims that the neocon movement has been running too deep for far too long in this country. We need to get back to true, patriotic conservatism and restore the high view of the Constitution.

 
Comment by Jennie Stewart

I have been waiting for him, I agree more with him than anyone else., I am in Arkansas and do not like my higher taxes, and Huckabee’s/McCain Immigration policy. I thought when the country found out his assets he could pick up a great base of GOP.

Jennie Stewart
Texarkana, Arkansas

 
Comment by Charles Offenbacher

I am simply astounded that Fox News would not let Ron Paul in the debates. That is absolute… … … . He’s polling higher in New Hampshire than some of the attendees and absolutely dominated lame-duck Rudy in Iowa. On what grounds is he excluded?

I know I’m excluding Fox News from my watch list, now. Fair and balanced, ha! I’ll give CNN and MSNBC fair and balanced viewing now, 50-50.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It