Paul, Hunter Force Leading GOP Candidates to Pay Attention
While Congressmen Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter rank below the other Republican presidential candidates in national polls, they nonetheless hit on key issues for particular blocs and occasionally force the top tier to take notice.
The super-early, front-loaded primary calendar, combined with a mildly enthusiastic Republican base, has enabled these two boutique candidates to energize the field, said Mark Wrighton, politics professor at Millikin University in Illinois.
“We’re really sort of in uncharted territory here and we’re seeing some interesting things occur,” Wrighton said.
One of the unexpected, big moves in the race so far has been the catapult of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, from what was generally considered a darkhorse, second-tier position to frontrunner status in Iowa; he has become the most talked about Republican candidate in the field.
Paul has surprised everyone by attracting what many are saying is the largest grassroots movement since independent Ross Perot in 1992. The limited government, anti-war libertarian raised more than $19 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 and he has a legion of avid volunteers knocking door to door and blogging all over the country on his behalf.
While his chances for winning the nomination appear slim, Paul earned 9 percent of the vote in a Des Moines Register survey of likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers released Tuesday. An average of national polling puts him at 4.3 percent.
Meanwhile, Hunter may not have the the broad appeal of the current GOP frontrunners, but is certainly generating — and riding — the wave of Republican energy on issues like illegal immigration and border security.
Hunter, a California congressman, has forged his campaign on Republican anger at what he perceives is federal immobility on curbing illegal immigration, incentives that attract undocumented workers and their families here and so-called “sanctuary cities” that do not penalize or pursue illegal immigrants within their jurisdictions.
Hunter, who was chairman of the Armed Services Committee before Democrats took over the majority in the House of Representatives in 2007, is known primarily for successfully pushing through legislation for erecting a security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border. He’s been tough on the outsourcing of American business to foreigners and has been steadfast in this support of the war policy in Iraq.
But his star has been dimmed by the brighter, though in some ways, less purely conservative lights of the so-called “top tier.”
“I’ve known Duncan Hunter since 1980,” said John Gizzi, political editor of Human Events. “He’s one of the most decent people I know. He places ethics above everything else. He’s honorable to a fault.”
But with Hunter polling around 1 percent, Gizzi said the candidate might be looking toward other things.
“If there is a Republican president, (Hunter) would make an outstanding secretary of defense.”
Paul has not been so overshadowed. The 10-term congressman from Texas who was the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate in 1988, has never enjoyed so much national notoriety and support as he does now, mostly because he is the only Republican candidate who has articulated opposition to the war, independence from the GOP machine and a strict constructionist view of the Constitution.
“He’s surprising a lot of people with the buzz he’s getting,” said Sean Evans, a professor of politics at Union University in Tennessee. “There’s a strong libertarian streak in the Republican Party and he’s speaking to that. He’s speaking to a certain demographic that no one has been able to.”
During the GOP debates Paul, 72, offered push-back against the other candidates, particularly on Iraq. Rudy Giuliani, the frontrunner in national polls, was able to make headlines off Paul when he scolded him for suggesting that it was U.S. policy that led to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. But Paul didn’t back down and therein lies his appeal, said conservative political consultant Chuck Muth, also head of Citizen Outreach.
“He’s never worried about the Republican establishment, that’s for sure,” he said. “He means what he says. I think his personality has attracted so many people who may hadn’t heard of Ron Paul before this presidential campaign.”





We here in North Carolina are getting very tired of the media elitist telling us that we have to pick amongst the liberal candidates they are trying to shove down our throats. The media, including those at Fox News are trying it seems to demoralize the christian conservate base of the republican party by denying us the oppertunity to hear and choose amongst conservative candidates such as Duncan Hunter and (though he is no longer in the race) Tom Tancredo. The elitist in the media are effectively handing the presidency over to the liberals by demoralizing us the the christian conservative base with the choices of presidential candidates they are trying to tell us we have to choose from. Yes we are free to vote for these candidates if the are able to stay in the race long enough to make it to our perspective primaries, but with little to know media coverage, the so called second teir candidates as the media elitist like to call them, don’t stand a chance of gaining the support of we the people, who in most cases don’t even know these candidates are running becuase the don’t see them on the news or as of late in the debates. We the people are being robbed of our right to choose for ourselves. Jamie Standridge, Gastonia, NC.
No more FOX in my house. I’ve blocked the channels on all boxes at the house.
I can’t believe that FOX would think American citizens are stupid enough not to see through them blocking Ron Paul from the debates & media exposure.
What kind of democracy is this?
Sometimes we don’t realize we don’t like something until we see it beside something we like more.
Leaving presidential candidates out of the debate last night was terribly unfair and unbalanced. Polls are fickle at best, and basing the debate participants on a poll ranking is an unsound decision. Excluding any Republican presidential candidate who wished to participate from the forum was arrogant. The citizens of this county should hear from all the candidates. Elections determine who people care to listen to, not polls.
I hope this poor move by Fox was simply a judgment error and not an indication the folks at Fox are attempting to affect the outcome of the Republican nomination.
Shameful and outrageous!
The only two candidates who aren’t playing for the CFR team were snubbed in NH. They have Shemp and Gretel try to explain it away and garner some sympathy for their decision. “No room on the bus, we need to dig deeper into topics…” pathetic!
It is not your priveledge to choose for the people of the U.S. whom they may vote for and this little page you put up as some sort of patronizing peace offering will not get you off the hook for your crime. You have already become the news by your interference. Murdoch and his CFR buds are only awakening America to the need for revolution!
Duncan Hunter is in 3rd place in the official national delegate count but doesn’t “qualify” for the FOX debate?
SHAME ON YOU FOX NEWS, Shame on you.
I used to be a big Fox News fan, but after seeing THIS… not so much. We can get this caliber of reporting over at MSNBC.
fox rots
FOX News has proven how UNfair and UNbalanced they are by excluding Ron Paul from the debate. Sickening.
Thousands of Americans are taking serious notice of Ron Paul and his messages. Too bad that Fox News is too short-sighted to recognize the candidate who is winning the popular vote hands down!
Are you using your “freedom of the press” to censor Ron Paul’s and Duncan Hunter’s “Freedom of Speech”?
Fox is now a “whimp” in my book, and not worth my time! BYE-BYE!!
Fox News is the most horrible network out there. Ron Paul should be at that debate tonight, he did after all get MORE votes than Rude Rudy in the Iowa Caucus. But no, FOX news is now the prime leader in censorship in politics. It’s funny because FOX probably has some of the worst content on their television shows and they don’t censor that CRAP. But you censor a popular candidate who brings new and different ideas. All the politicians on the FOX debate tonight will say exactly the same thing in terms of Iraq. However, they will most likely just attack one another and make themselves look like a bunch of donkeys. I’m not watching this debate because Ron Paul is not there. I can’t stand the FOX network or their affiliates. I am so HAPPY that the New Hampshire GOP pulled their sponsorship from the pathetic FOX GOP debate.
Fox Decide 2008. Not You Decide 2008. Fox is all for censorship. The unfair and totally unbalanced shows are on fox news.