It’s the Campaign, Stupid: Clinton Ground Game Under Fire
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama arrive on stage for a debate Tuesday at Cleveland State University in Ohio, their last debate before the crucial March 4 primaries. (AP Photo)
The political team that famously used the phrase “It’s the economy, stupid” to vault to victory in 1992 could be in need of a new mantra 15 years later: It’s the campaign, stupid.
Hillary Clinton has slipped from “inevitable” front-runner to second fiddle over the past two months, and political observers have chimed in with their take on what went wrong: No plan for after Super Tuesday. A poor caucus strategy. Her husband.
Leon Panetta, former White House chief of staff to Bill Clinton, is the latest Clinton loyalist to come out and criticize the campaign. And he suggests the problem was all of the above.
“It seems to me like they rolled the dice on Super Tuesday, thinking that would end it,” Panetta told The New York Observer. “And when it didn’t end it, they didn’t have a plan. And when it came to the caucus states, they did have a plan — which was to ignore them. I think those were serious mistakes.”
Since Feb. 5, when Barack Obama and Clinton ended the 22-state Super Tuesday marathon in a near-draw in terms of delegates, Obama has seized the lead in fundraising, contests won and total delegates. Clinton now is depending on a big comeback in the Ohio and Texas primaries next Tuesday, March 4, to turn the ship around.
Panetta put much of the blame on Clinton campaign strategist Mark Penn, comparing him to an old-school operative like Karl Rove who is “all about dividing people into smaller groups rather than taking the broader approach that was needed.”
He said Obama captured the desire for change in Washington, and that the call for such change was underestimated.
He also spoke cautiously about his former boss, according to the Observer, saying that Bill Clinton sometimes has “quick reactions to things” and that it’s the job of his staff to prepare him and allow him to let off steam before entering the public arena.
The former president caused a stir before the South Carolina primary by calling Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war a “fairy tale.” He also snapped at reporters on occasion.
Clinton’s superdelegates — party officials and insiders who go to the August convention free to support either candidate, regardless of their states’ primary and caucus results — have started to cross over.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported Wednesday that one of Clinton’s high-profile superdelegate supporters, Georgia Rep. John Lewis, is formally switching his support to Obama. That was reported in The New York Times nearly two weeks ago, but a Lewis spokesman said at the time that the decision was not final. After some confusion over what the onetime civil rights leader would do, the Georgia congressman told the Journal-Constitution that “Barack Obama has tapped into something that is extraordinary.” He cited his Atlanta district’s preference for Obama in his decision to switch loyalties.
North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan, an ally of Bill Clinton, also endorsed Obama Wednesday, citing his record on trade.
Clinton’s own campaign has started to talk with more candor about her possibilities if she doesn’t carry Ohio and Texas on Tuesday.
“If she wins those, we then go on to April 22 in Pennsylvania,” Clinton campaign national chairman Terry McAuliffe told a business group in Madison, Wis. “If we don’t, then she has to make a decision on what she’s going to do.”
Bill Clinton has made similar comments.
An article in The New York Times said Clinton is throwing the “kitchen sink” at Obama to regain her footing.
She was on the offensive Tuesday night in Cleveland at their final debate before March 4. Clinton challenged Obama on his commitment to providing universal health care and ending the war in Iraq since he was elected to the U.S. Senate. She also complained that she was frequently the first candidate asked a question by debate moderators, suggesting she feels she has been unfairly targeted by the media.
Democratic strategist and FOX News contributor Susan Estrich said the candidates ended the debate where they started.
“Whoever you were for going in, won,” she said. “There was no knockout punch and, frankly, Hillary could use a knockout punch.”
Polls show Clinton is leading in Ohio but losing ground quickly to Obama, who already has taken the lead in some Texas polls.
A Rasmussen poll taken Monday of 862 likely voters in Ohio showed Clinton with a 5-point lead over Obama, 48 to 43 percent. That’s down from a 14-point lead over the Illinois senator in a similar Rasmussen poll taken Feb. 13.
Bill Clinton told a crowd of 1,000 supporters in Fort Worth, Texas, Tuesday that the polls are up in the air.
“It is a tough election and the polls go back and forth and the Gallup polls say Hillary picked up 6 points in the last three days nationwide. It’s going back and forth, back and forth,” he said.
The latest Gallup tracking poll at the time showed the candidates tied at 46 percent each. But an updated poll from Sunday through Tuesday showed Obama with 48 percent to Clinton’s 43 percent.
Penn and Clinton spokesman Phil Singer released a memo Tuesday saying they’ve developed a campaign schedule “that demonstrates and underscores Hillary’s strength and experience on the national security front and in her approach to solving our economic challenges.”
They said the campaign has 41,000 volunteers on the ground in Texas and 26,000 in Ohio. Surrogates, including Bill Clinton and their daughter Chelsea, are traveling across both states, as the New York senator schedules addresses on child poverty, veteran issues and the economy.
Penn told the Observer that the campaign strategy has been misunderstood.
“The campaign has been about big goals, health care, ending the Iraq war, new energy, the future,” he told the newspaper. “There was a misunderstanding that this campaign was about small things. It never was. If anything, the Obama campaign has microtargeted constituencies.”
Click here to read the article about Leon Panetta in The New York Observer.
FOX News’ Shushannah Walshe and The Associated Press contributed to this report.





I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP AND TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE……..Obama has too many unanswered question and he is very shady why do we want someone with his back ground running our country and what about his American hater wife why do we want her in the White House, sounds like trouble to me…….I agree Hillary is no better but if I have a choice I am affraid I would have to go with Hillary at least we wouldnt have to worry about her turning our country over to the enimies. This whole election is one big mess.
Hillary whines because she always gets the first questions in a debate.
Reality Check here, please!
You want to be Commander In Chief, not only will the FIRST questions be posed to you but ALL of them!
Ridiculous statements she made last night.
The media didn’t sink her campaign, she did it ALL by herself.
Wow: Some folks Love to Hate Hillary, she is so shrill, and phoney balooney. Obama is so slick, and polished, just like the Trial Lawyer he was born to be. Get a Grip folks, your vote is a joke, your participation is just the fodder to justify the powers that be. Your going to pay more money in tax, and get crap for health care. Look what happend in England/France. All established people go to private Doctors, and get real care, ONLY the working class poor go to the FREE health care. So kids try not to get to worked up, you don’t matter, you never mattered, go back to your TV’s.
To all you liberals and democrats (mostly Obamacrats),
Remeber all the Liberals promising that their first 100 days in congress were going to change everything? What did they accomplish? What should we expect Obama to accomplish? I think that is reason enough to not trust Obama or Clinton. Democrat congressman promised change, and delivered nothing but Bush hating. Why don’t we elect them, good idea Obamacrats.
Fox News: I see your note below where you say the comment may take some time to appear due to moderation, but two and a half hours? I followed your terms of use above as always, but note that at the time I posted my comment, Mr. Holden’s was the last one. Did you shut the comments down on this thread?
So, Obama has more “street smarts” than Clinton. I think I get it now. This means flowery campaign speeches that are completely devoid of moral values or substance wins over re-inventing one’s self every week or two. The reality is that the entire democratic platform isn’t worth the recycled newspaper it would take to print it out.
Hopefully, Sen. McCain can navigate throught the dangerous waters of the twisted liberal media and claim the prize that he deserves far more than the daft social engineers on the dark side of the isle.
Could you please tell me which pastor in this world who doesn’t make comment about other religion…for your info, they all do. Lets take the catholic for example, the priest screw around with kids and what happen - people still go to their church…which is worst - Obama situation or the family who’s child is molested by priest…hmmmm. People 95% of what the paster feed people in church is garbage, but they still go anyway.
Yes obama acknowledge that the pastor was wrong. So what should he do - stop talking to the pastor…well let me see…how many of use have said something that was so wrong, wow this world would be in a mess if we all stop talking to each other for saying something wrong. Please grow up people..use some of the common sense god gave you..please, please.
If Hillery is running her campain so badly what makes you think she could run the government any better.
There is only one problem to Clinton. Her campaign was bad, their themes empty and above all she failed to convince the American people.
Arguing that Obama lacks foreign policy experience is just stupid. The best policy of the US is the one that most the other world will embrace and agree with. The poll internationally show that his views are favored by the majority of the world except the French (the champion in hypocrisy). Obama lived in many countries and understand more than anybody what the US should do to lead the world. But if the US is interested only in what the corrupted and the dictators head of states you might be right in electing Hillary or McCain
Obama and shady background? Has everyone forgotten about the scandal after scandal (and body after body) in the Whitehouse when the Clintons were in power?