Michigan Democrats Agree to Push for Early June Primary Re-Do

Border

WASHINGTON — Michigan Democrats agreed Friday to push a do-over primary in early June to give them a say in the close presidential race between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

Amid talks with the two campaigns, the four Michigan Democrats said in a statement they were “focusing on the possibility of a state-run primary in early June which would not use any state funding.” Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, one of the Democratic participants, said a likely date is June 3.

“This option would require the passage of legislation by the state legislature, and we look forward to working with the members of the legislature in the coming days to see if this option can be made a reality,” the Democrats said.

Other Michigan Democrats working on the plan were Democratic National Committee member Debbie Dingell, Sen. Carl Levin and United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger.

Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, said the potential privately funded primary was “a good first step” toward seating the state’s delegation at the Democratic National Convention.

The agreement now hinges on getting the campaigns and party officials to approve legislation, still being written, that would set the primary for early June. In the statement, Brewer said party leaders would need to write legislation “that is acceptable to the MDP and both the Clinton and Obama campaigns.”

To go forward, any plan would require the approval of the two campaigns, the Democratic National Committee, state party leaders and Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who is backing Clinton. Brewer said a revised delegate plan would also need to be approved by the state party’s executive committee and the DNC’s rules and bylaws committee.

Michigan Democrats need to act quickly because the politically divided legislature will have to sign off on the deal and approve how to spend the privately raised funds for a new election. Members of the Democratic-controlled state House and Republican-controlled state Senate leave at the end of the month on their two-week spring break.

The contest must be held by June 10 for the results to count under DNC rules.

The national party punished Michigan and Florida for moving up their primaries before Feb. 5, stripping them of all their delegates. The two states have been struggling to come up with alternative plans to ensure their delegates are seated at the national convention this summer in Denver.

Michigan held its primary Jan. 15 and Florida voted Jan. 29. Clinton won both, although she was the only major candidate on the Michigan ballot.

Kilpatrick said although she is optimistic, Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey has expressed concern they may not have the time or manpower to pull it off. She said they are trying to work through those issues.

Both campaigns said they would evaluate the plans. Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the campaign hoped “a resolution can be arrived at that is fair and practical.”

Former Michigan Gov. James Blanchard, the co-chairman of Clinton’s Michigan campaign, said they were “looking at this with great interest … it has some great possibilities.”

Florida Democrats said they will make a decision by Monday on whether to hold a dual mail-in and in-person re-vote. But the plan floated this week faces opposition from the state’s Democratic congressional delegation, and Obama has also expressed concerns about security and accuracy of a mail-in vote organized so quickly. Democratic National Committee rules require the vote to be scheduled by June 10.

Florida DNC member Jon Ausman on Friday filed an appeal to the rules committee asking that the state’s 23 superdelegates and half its at-large delegates be restored. He argued that party rules say superdelegates “shall” be seated and that the punishment for holding an early primary is losing half the at-large delegates.

“They far exceeded their authority by giving us the death penalty,” Ausman said.

While party rules at the time the primary date was moved did say that states would lose half their delegates, the rules committee later voted to strip Florida of all its delegates. Florida had 210 delegates, including 185 pledged delegates.

 

 

 

 

51 Responses to “Michigan Democrats Agree to Push for Early June Primary Re-Do”

Pages: « 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by McNarstle

Can someone explain why a state would move its primary up and lose its delegates in the first place?

What is the upside?

 
Comment by Kelly Tiers

As a Michigander, I feel that a do over should NOT happen in Michigan or Flordia. Choices were made by the Democratic party before the voting happened and they need to stick to these choices. I feel that this want of a do over shows the true colors of the party and that they can not face the consequences of their decisions. If they lose the election this year are they going to want a do over because they picked the wrong candidate?

 
Comment by Magli Huguet-Perez

We Floridians are very angry that our vote does not mean anything. There was no campaign here in Florida from democrats even though OBAMA manage tosneak some political ads on TV.

All the Democrats candidates were in the ballot and we selected and voted for Hillary Clinton and she WON !
The Democratic party better do something fast and make ourvote count.

 
Comment by Caleb

I’m surprised Granholm isn’t going to raise taxes on the big 3 in order to fund this bureaucratic nightmare.

 
Comment by Richard Wilson

The Dems made the rules and they should adhere to them, then perhaps this States Politicians would have listened before they decided to change the date for voting. You say that the Party is going to pay for this, show us the proof. I don’t want my tax dollars paying for your mistakes.

 
Comment by mary from Europe

Of course these two delegations have to be seated by compromise; if Barach sees it, then anybody can. Although I will vote for McCain, and I am sympathetic to Hillary, on this point I give Barach some credit- he sees something has to be done.

 
Comment by Carlos Ventura

The supposed leaders of Florida and Michigan broke the rules and now their citizens are paying the price, I hope that they don’t re-vote in Florida and Michigan maybe next time they will follow procedures. The Democratic National Committee should set an example out of them.

 
Comment by HOOSIER

DONT AGREE TO IT OBAMA!!! HILLARY ONCE AGAIN CHANGING THE RULES, MOVING THE GOAL-POSTS MID-GAME. THE CLINTONS WILL DO ANYTHING TO WIN. AMERICA DESERVES BETTER THAN HILLARY CLINTON. WE DONT NEED BILL CLINTON BACK BEHIND THE DESK.

McCAIN 2008

 
Comment by Draya Stahl

Obama was tne one who decided to give into peer pressure and slap the Michigan democrats. WHY should he be allowed to change his mind? It was his choice.

 
Comment by Milton Krugman `

O.K. If your going to spend the money of democrats to correct the problems caused by democrats, enjoy yourself!! If anyone intends to seek Republican based funds for this nonsense, stand back, your about to become a target of great abuse.

Milton

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It