Probe of Candidate Passport Breach Deepens, Contract Companies Identified
All three major presidential candidates have had their passport records breached, the State Department confirms.
The State Department confirmed late Friday that the contractors who gained improper access to Barack Obama’s passport files worked for two Virginia-based companies, after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice promised a full investigation into breaches that affected all three presidential candidates.
The two contractors fired for snooping into Obama’s records worked for Arlington, Va.-based Stanley Inc. Earlier this week, the 3,500-person company won a five-year, $570-million contract to support passport services at the State Department.
The other company was identified as The Analysis Corporation.
FOX News has learned that newly minted House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman, D-Calif., will launch a probe into the cases, as Obama called for Congress to get involved.
At least four State Department workers were behind the violations — Hillary Clinton and John McCain found out their files were improperly accessed not long after Rice apologized to Obama.
“When you have not just one but a series of attempts to tap into peoples’ personal records, that’s a problem not just for me but for how our government functions,” Obama told reporters in Portland, Ore. “I expect a thorough and full investigation. It should be in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight function so it’s not simply an internal matter.”
The department’s inspector general launched an investigation into the matter Thursday, and the Department of Justice has been notified.
“We do feel that the system worked, but the system isn’t perfect,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said at a briefing Friday afternoon.
Obama’s campaign called the breach of his records “outrageous” when the news was brought to their attention Thursday, and even suggested political motives were behind it. His records were reportedly accessed on three separate occasions this year.
But Friday morning the case swiftly expanded, with the identities and motivations of those involved still undisclosed.
McCormack said an individual who accessed Obama’s files also reviewed McCain’s file earlier this year. This contract employee has been reprimanded, but not fired.
McCormack said the Clinton breach occurred in summer 2007 during a training exercise in which employees were asked to search the electronic file by entering a name. While the employees were encouraged to enter family names, one employee entered Clinton’s name.
McCormack said the trainee was admonished, and “it didn’t happen again.”
He said Rice reached out to apologize to all three candidates.
“Senator Clinton will closely monitor the State Department’s investigation into this and the other breaches of private passport information,” Clinton’s Senate office said in a statement.
McCormack said the Obama violations were detected by internal State Department computer checks, which flag certain records of high-profile people when someone tries to access the records improperly.
But he said senior management only just learned of the violations, and that the discovery “should have been passed up the line” to senior management earlier.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton issued a stern statement Thursday night, saying: “This is an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an Administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years. Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.
“This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama’s passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.”
McCain issued a statement saying: “The U.S. government has a responsibility to respect the privacy of all Americans. It appears that privacy was breached and I expect a thorough review and a change in procedures as necessary to ensure the privacy of all passport files.”
The contract companies identified in the case both released statements Friday decrying the breaches.
The Stanley firm said it regretted the “rare occurrence” of unauthorized access of any individual’s private information. When it fired the two subcontractors involved in accessing the Obama files, terminating them the day the incident was discovered, Stanley was not aware of others performing unauthorized searches of McCain or Clinton’s files, the company said.
The Analysis Corp., or TAC, issued a statement late Friday saying it had been notified earlier in the day that one of its contractors had acted improperly.
“This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at TAC and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” wrote the company, based in McLean, Va.
Former Independent Counsel Joseph diGenova said the firings of the contract employees will make the investigation more difficult because the inspector general can’t compel them to talk.
“My guess is if he tries to talk to them now, in all likelihood they will take the Fifth,” diGenova said, referring to the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.





I would like to express my feelings about the passport breach, I don’t know what the big deal on this? I think obama wants to shift the attention a way from his friend the Rev. Wright, I do not think it should be a investigation, a waste of taxpayer money!!!. I think the government has a right to look at any records they have on any citizen if they do it legally, I think the reason the senator is hostile toward the State Dept. He has something to hide, like his association with the so called Rev. Wright, his association with the leader of the black panther Association, and Mr. Farrakhan.. I think all of the records of the above that the government has on them should be checked out!! Thank you, fox, for letting me express my opinion.. FOX’ PLEASE POST MY COMMENTS!!!..
I would like to
With the Patriot Act and all the surveillance allowed, why is this a big deal? If top security background checks exist for all three candidates for all three candidates can this type of information be made publicly available prior to the end of the democratic primary? If background check information does not exist, perhaps it should be a precondition for candidates to run for any public office in this country to prevent infiltration of threats. Prior drug use has been a subject of controversy for civil servants obtaining a clearance. Random drug testing is common for the working class; will the candidates subject themselves to this type of scrutiny?
Fox News why would post such a bad picture of McCain. Are planting a hiden message?
THIS IS GREAT!
I enjoy seeing the entire Liberals on Fox News post site CRYING foul for Obama. This GREAT! While you all are crying for the Democrats you are helping them in avoiding the ISSUES. The Democrat candidates are now acting like immature children.
McCain is out and about and being more and more Presidential in addition, he has his priorities in order.
Keep it up Liberal I love every minute of you crying and enjoy McCain’s numbers climbing. I love it!
Thank you Liberals keep up the good work!
If the access was done during a training exercise, then the State Department’s process for doing training should include a “training-only” database or data subset that would include only fictitious passport entries. IMHO these employees are the fall-guys for a flawed IT security system and a less-than-ideal training environment.
I’ve been in IT for 30 years (public and private sector), and it’s common that users who have access to personal data will occasionally browse the data for high-profile names, family members, business rivals, etc.
Has State looked into this issue to see whether other names (high-profile or otherwise) were improperly accessed?
Who cares about the passports? There’s nothing there. The Obama camp is trying to divert attention away from his problems….typical media tactic.
Passport files are pretty boring unless someone is looking to find a person’s social security number, date of birth, place of birth, mother’s maiden name, etc. Sound familiar ? These are the keys to open up other sources of information such as credit histories, driving records, etc. I would suspect that there was something fishy going on.
We will have another congressional investigation that will last through the eleciton season and then disappear. Democrats will come out with 10 to 12 congress people on their side as usual and Republicans with 1 or 2 if they show up at all. Each congressman is given 5 minutes and they’ll go three rounds with each witness. That will be 3 hours of hog wash and half truths vs 30 minutes for the Republicans. Democrats will tell every half-truth and leading question to suggest wrong and Republicans will mount some lame defense of the system and never expose the Democrat for what he does. We pay for this nonsense and C-span will devote hours and hours of live coverage to this non-story. The most destructive, fabricated sound-bites will appear on the national news out of context to make it appear Democrats have found a great wrong and another reason to get rid of those rascally Republicans. Welcome to the political season. I’m concerned that many of you may think that some big secret is contained in a passport application. You should go down to the post office and fill one out. Besides, who would really want to steal Barak’s identity. I can just see someone trying to use his social security number… free trip to jail.
Your social security number is the least private number you own. Everybodys is floating around the electronic world in multiple venues. Why does everyone get so excited. You take measures to protect it easily through the credit bureaus. It is called a fraud alert. There is absolutely nothing in passport files that cannot be found in other places; see FSO GT above. I seriously doubt that the snoopers were after Obama’s SSN and with the lack of information on the appliction it makes one wonder what they were trying to find…has anyone bothered to ask the individuals fired? This is a non-issue.