Probe of Candidate Passport Breach Deepens, Contract Companies Identified

Border

All three major presidential candidates have had their passport records breached, the State Department confirms.

The State Department confirmed late Friday that the contractors who gained improper access to Barack Obama’s passport files worked for two Virginia-based companies, after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice promised a full investigation into breaches that affected all three presidential candidates.

The two contractors fired for snooping into Obama’s records worked for Arlington, Va.-based Stanley Inc. Earlier this week, the 3,500-person company won a five-year, $570-million contract to support passport services at the State Department.

The other company was identified as The Analysis Corporation.

FOX News has learned that newly minted House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman, D-Calif., will launch a probe into the cases, as Obama called for Congress to get involved.

At least four State Department workers were behind the violations — Hillary Clinton and John McCain found out their files were improperly accessed not long after Rice apologized to Obama.

“When you have not just one but a series of attempts to tap into peoples’ personal records, that’s a problem not just for me but for how our government functions,” Obama told reporters in Portland, Ore. “I expect a thorough and full investigation. It should be in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight function so it’s not simply an internal matter.”

The department’s inspector general launched an investigation into the matter Thursday, and the Department of Justice has been notified.

“We do feel that the system worked, but the system isn’t perfect,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said at a briefing Friday afternoon.

Obama’s campaign called the breach of his records “outrageous” when the news was brought to their attention Thursday, and even suggested political motives were behind it. His records were reportedly accessed on three separate occasions this year.

But Friday morning the case swiftly expanded, with the identities and motivations of those involved still undisclosed.

McCormack said an individual who accessed Obama’s files also reviewed McCain’s file earlier this year. This contract employee has been reprimanded, but not fired.

McCormack said the Clinton breach occurred in summer 2007 during a training exercise in which employees were asked to search the electronic file by entering a name. While the employees were encouraged to enter family names, one employee entered Clinton’s name.

McCormack said the trainee was admonished, and “it didn’t happen again.”

He said Rice reached out to apologize to all three candidates.

“Senator Clinton will closely monitor the State Department’s investigation into this and the other breaches of private passport information,” Clinton’s Senate office said in a statement.

McCormack said the Obama violations were detected by internal State Department computer checks, which flag certain records of high-profile people when someone tries to access the records improperly.

But he said senior management only just learned of the violations, and that the discovery “should have been passed up the line” to senior management earlier.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton issued a stern statement Thursday night, saying: “This is an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an Administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years. Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes.

“This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama’s passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.”

McCain issued a statement saying: “The U.S. government has a responsibility to respect the privacy of all Americans. It appears that privacy was breached and I expect a thorough review and a change in procedures as necessary to ensure the privacy of all passport files.”

The contract companies identified in the case both released statements Friday decrying the breaches.

The Stanley firm said it regretted the “rare occurrence” of unauthorized access of any individual’s private information. When it fired the two subcontractors involved in accessing the Obama files, terminating them the day the incident was discovered, Stanley was not aware of others performing unauthorized searches of McCain or Clinton’s files, the company said.

The Analysis Corp., or TAC, issued a statement late Friday saying it had been notified earlier in the day that one of its contractors had acted improperly.

“This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at TAC and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” wrote the company, based in McLean, Va.

Former Independent Counsel Joseph diGenova said the firings of the contract employees will make the investigation more difficult because the inspector general can’t compel them to talk.

“My guess is if he tries to talk to them now, in all likelihood they will take the Fifth,” diGenova said, referring to the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70 Responses to “Probe of Candidate Passport Breach Deepens, Contract Companies Identified”

Pages: « 7 6 5 4 3 [2] 1 » Show All

Comment by Typical Obama Supporter

OMG…I just say “Horton Hears a Who” with my BFF Jill and I am convinced there is a republican conspiracy going on here because Horton is an elephant, you know, like the GOP?

 
Comment by Change Bob Hope

Typical white people, always wanting information on candidates. Havent we moved beyond this as a nation? Cant we all just move past the hateful words and accept that the current administration had nothing to do with contractors who were nosey?

I heard one of the “media” ask why hadnt the other guy (the 3rd guy) been fired already for his actions. Why all the hate? What if he didnt mean to look and his fingers just happened to hit the keys accidentally? Should that blemish a career of good work?

I think everyone just needs to look into their heart and consider why they’re really being so hard on these good folks.

 
Comment by Greg in Oceanside, CA

I can just imagine how the Obama camp is taking this. They’re going to exploit this to the hilt. One sure way to take the heat off Obama, right? Sorry, but this is nothing too terrible and I think we all know Obama’s relationship with racists isn’t going to go away. The government knows more about us than what’s on a passport. Besides, Obama needs to come clean with his past and he still needs to be vetted anyway.

 
Comment by Tom

What’s the big deal here? A few employees got curious and they lost their jobs. Does that mean the whole administration or the whole government is doing something sneaky or illegal? I seriously doubt it. And so what if it has to do with the records of someone famous. Clinton, Obama, McCain, Brittney Spears, Paris Hilton…so what? Curious employees who should have known better got caught and they got what they deserved. Or maybe the State Dept overreacted because they were the records of someone famous. Dr Rice wouldn’t waste her time calling me if my records were looked at, and she should waste her time on someone who’s in the public eye.

 
Comment by latina

why does anybody find this surprising??

 
Comment by Leticia

Well knowing Clinton, McCain and poor Obama passports were all looked at. SO WHAT!!!
I guess this a dissappointed to Obama camp because they jumped right in and made it political. And try to change the subject Obama being best buddies with a racist. Poor Obama, he and his camp have to find something else to say they are picking on me.
And if the Obama camp is trying to make a big deal about a picture of Bill Clinton with the racist wright, there is a big difference. That was a public function with lots of people around and Bill Clinton is being courteous, as oppose to hugging and smiling Obama with his best buddy racist wright.
Obama do the honorable thing and step out as a candidate. If you win the nomination, you only win because you got unearned votes and un earned delegates. Its to late to take our votes back and you do not deserve to be the nominee. If you are, I am and alot of my democrat friends will vote for McCain. I do not want a president who best buddy is a racist.
Funny how we have not heard from Oprah and Ted Kennedy, a couple of weeks ago they were happy to stand by Obama, not now, I wonder why???

Obama step out of the race.

This note is for Fox, I keep leaving comments and you refuse to post them, why??? Are you part of the media that is craddling Obama????

 
Comment by Daniel in VA

Once Dr. Rice told them that an investigation was under way, it should have basically stopped there. So why didn’t it. Because it was an excellent opportunity for the hopefuls to draw attention to themselves taking positive public action on an issue that was sooooo outrageous. Now this type of thing has been going on since before computers, so why is it outrageous? Because it happened to a presidential hopeful? Nope. Because before today we were blissfully and purposefully ignorant to what went on behind closed doors. The funny part about this is that in a few months, the general public will have calmed down and probably by then end of next year only a handful of people will remember it. Don’t let the headlines tell the story. Read between the lines and give thought to what is really going on.

 
Comment by Kris

Yeah - like we need to spend money on a “complete and through investigation.” Sounds like a great way to waste $1M of the tax-payers’ dollars. Someone broke policy (perhaps the law), end of story. What else do we need to know? This is a great indication, however, of how Obama would be with the public treasury, should he take office. There’s no problem than money and a congressional oversight committee can’t fix, right Obama?

 
Comment by mickie schuessler

The public good must outweigh the need for privacy.
Our chief must not have something to hide.
we the people of this great country want our country back.
we are now a country ruled by greed.
shame!!!!!!!!

 
Comment by Jeff

I guess I don’t quite understand why a backround check, including out of country travel is not required for someone that may be the top official of the United States.

Alot of jobs require backround checks. I would think for the President, the people would have a right to know where this person has traveled out of the country, and why?

What would there be to hide?

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It