Comments on: Clinton Senate Terms Marked by Few Legislative Achievements, Few Gaffes

By: Jack Cassell

Jack Cassell — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:18:53 +0000

Why would anyone expect Hillary’s presidency to be anymore productive than her Senate run?

By: Carl

Carl — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:57:19 +0000

Clinton only went after the New York Senator position, so she could run for President. She has doing this from DAY ONE.

By: Jim from Jacksonville

Jim from Jacksonville — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:01:47 +0000

“her roots” ???? New York???? Didn’t she and Bill abandon Arkansas a while back because NY played better into their plans? We don’t need ANY more Clinton yaers in the White House. Scary thought having them represent our Nation again …. at the rate it the campaign is going, doesn’t look like it will happer, thankfully! Her (and his) exaggerated claims of accomplishmnets continue to be exposed and taken apart! We’ll get to enjoy John McCain in the Presidency for the next four years thanks in part to the continued in-fighting and the Clinton’s assumptions that they have a right to be back in the White House. Give up Hillary!!

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:51:09 +0000

Reading these blogs leads one to believe that most of you were still kids during the clinton administration. Go research the history of their whitehouse tour, and don’t say they fixed the economy. The economy didn’t recover until the republicans took over the senate and congress. Since the dems took back the senate and congress look where the economy went.

Why hasen’t the news people picked up Hillary’s combat lie; landing under fire, having to run bent over to the terminal to excape the fire. Never happened.

By: Spectator

Spectator — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:01:06 +0000

Hillary Clinton has the necessary experience and the requisite resume to be President of the United States. She has lately come around as someone who is desperate, and will say or do anything to win and i believe voters are beginning to take note of that. Some antics being employed by her campaign and her surrogates are outright duty and i want to bet the Americans people can see through that.

By: Lynn

Lynn — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:33:39 +0000

Snoopy in Indiana - I agree with you - this is the 4th time I have tried to put comments
online that are against Clinton and FOX NEWS’ bias coverage - but they never get
put on line - FAIR and BALANCED is a myth - just like the myth that Clinton still has a
chance of winning.

If you haven’t figured out yet - “It’s all about me(Clinton)” - she and her husband don’t care
if they take the whole party down with them - they should be ashamed of tearing this party
apart - take your marbles and go home already.

By: keny

keny — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:41:43 +0000

Please start now to practice how to say ‘PRESIDENT OBOMA.’
Keny

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:19:16 +0000

The problem isn’t her relative lack of experience. Less than two terms of elected office over a 60 year life. The problem is that she claims to have such great experience because her husband was elected Governor, and President. That is his achievement and experience not hers. No doubt she worked hard to get him elected but holding the job and being first lady are quite two different things as we all know. Why lie, and manipulate the record?

By: Tom V

Tom V — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:15:57 +0000

Dear Fox, AP
A list of both Clinton & Obama’s sponsored bills are available in the Library of Congress, so take a look….For someone who has “barely unpacked his bags” in the US Senate, Obama’s record would be a credit to any two or three term Senator.
Clinton’s list is not going to convince you she has experience…its pretty light on substance, and inferior to Obama’s, even though she’s been there six years longer.
I encourage Fox News and the AP to do some homework and analysis for us. Shine the light on what’s there, so we may all be more informed voters
Tom V

By: Ed

Ed — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:41:37 +0000

So much for touting all these years of experience getting….. nothing done.

How could anyone blame Obama’s campaign for not allowing FL and MI to vote. Barack is not at fault for this. All the camps new what the DNC’s decision was and everyone agreed, so what is Clinton barking about now…. I know, she is hurting so she wants the rules overturned for her. She thought that she had it all wraped up on Super Tuesday, but the shocker is still taking its toll.

And, who are we spiting when we vote McCain and not a democrat candidate. Think about it.

By: ldh

ldh — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:02:34 +0000

Go Hillary!

Women always need to do 4 xs as well as men to be given any credit.

At least she did not spend most of her time voting “present” and allowing bills that she helped draft to die by backing away from them as they hit the senate floor.

By: Bea1954

Bea1954 — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:23:02 +0000

The most amusing tall tale by Hillary yet! How she ducked sniper fire when they landed while on a pre-presidential visit - for her husband, no less! Photos and reports tell it like it is. She was greeted by a small child bearing flowers. She wouldn’t know how to tell the truth if it hit her in the face.

By: Cam

Cam — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:46:46 +0000

Vote as you see fit, but if we have to pay higher taxes. Well the Democrats already did away with President Bush tax plan. If more of your jobs go aways
Well just be proud that you help make that possible.

By: Joan

Joan — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:33:28 +0000

I’m a Florida Democrat and if my vote doesn’t count in Primary, neither Obama or Hillary will get it. McCain will.

By: ann

ann — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:17:25 +0000

Sen. Clinton DOES have experience on BOTH Ends of Pennsylvania Ave.–What can Obama say??!!– ahhh, ahhh, he voted “present” over a 100 times in ILL legislature. He HAS NO experience, talk about a “thin resume!” Wake up America, the Obama campaign is behind all this trashing of Hillary so we don’t learn who Barry or is it Barack no middle name Obama is–Mr. Mystery Man–well the honeymoon is over, the Media and the people of the United States are on to you now–and the “outing” is still coming.
Sen. Edwards, endorse Hillary… Best Dem Ticket CLINTON/EDWARDS in 2008

By: lana1954

lana1954 — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:16:07 +0000

Why not let the voters decide who should be the next nominee. Why wont Obama let FL and MI re-vote and whoever ends up with the most total votes be the nominee.

By: lucy in Pa

lucy in Pa — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:10:58 +0000

Hillary never plays by the rules. Hillary cannot tell the truth and the Clinton machine with all its favors owed can’t persuade Americans to vote for her. Let us see what she comes up with next.

By: snoopy in indiana

snoopy in indiana — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:08:06 +0000

I keep posting my comments, but they are not on the board. Anyway else having problems if you are not a Hillary supporter?

By: Susan Moore

Susan Moore — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:04:28 +0000

If the Clintons are such public minded people why are they still in this race? I think that Hillary would rather see a republican win than be defeated by a fellow democratic. She can’t possible win this race. Is she hoping to take the nomination away from Obama who has more states, more delegates, and more popular vote? This would surely split the party and could possible destroy it. If that happens I know I would never vote for her. They are people with only their own agenda..To heck with popular vote. To heck with more states. To heck with more delegates. The votes in Michigan and Florida were not supposed to count because they moved up their elections, all the canidates understood this. Many people didn’t bother to vote. Why should they if their vote wasn’t going to count? Now since Hillary is losing, she wants a do-over. We had do-overs as kids when we played games and didn’t win….If Hillary has any class she will withdraw so Obama can concentrate on winning the national election.

By: snoopy in Indiana

snoopy in Indiana — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:03:32 +0000

Yes, again we see that Hillary made comments about her past history making executive decisions and ability to step in the role as president based on her past years as the White House first lady. I am sure that most educated people knew again she was talking out of both sides of her month. She voted for the war along with Bush. Her judgement is in question. She tried for 10 years to get health reform and was was unable to do it. She cmpagained for NAFTA saying it was good for the American people and then in Ohio and Pa said she was against it. She agreed to the DNC rules regarding the primaries and then calls foul when Mi. and Fla violated the rules. Lie, lie, lie. She stood by her husband for political reasons on her part. Do white American women want a woman so badly that they will put the 2nd half of the Clinton machine in office?