Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is among those working to resolve the prolonged Democratic primary battle before the August convention. (AP Photo)
Democratic officials are rapidly concluding that their party won’t have a presidential nominee ahead of the August national convention, despite increasing concerns that the party could be torn asunder if it doesn’t settle its race soon.
Few are holding out hope that the remaining contests will offer a clear-cut choice between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton has 1,499 pledged delegates to Obama’s 1,620 and the 10 contests still to be held don’t provide either candidate a foreseeable avenue to the nomination. The nominee needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nod.
With no expected solution at hand to hold new contests in Michigan and Florida — seen as states that could help clear a path to a choice — superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.
That means trying to pin down commitments before the Aug. 25-28 convention so that Democrats can remain competitive against Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain. But creating some kind of end-game ahead of the convention creates a new source of debate.
Prominent officials and lawmakers are discounting the idea of a pre-convention event that could be used to broker a deal among the superdelegates. That possibility gained wide attention last week when two-term Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested that Democrats hold a “superdelegate primary” over the course of two days in a neutral city this June.
Bredesen, who fears that a long-drawn-out battle will jeopardize his party’s chances of recapturing the White House come November, has called for the party’s 795 superdelegates to meet to hear from the two Democratic presidential hopefuls one last time before making a decision.
“No one wants this to come down to the superdelegates, but if we get to the first week of June and there’s still no clear winner we need to break the gridlock well before the convention. A superdelegate primary is a logical last resort that gets us to a decision sooner rather than later,” Bredesen said in a statement to FOXNews.com.
Obama said Wednesday he liked Bredesen’s suggestion: “I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful as opposed to having this drag on for two more months all the way up to the convention. I think that would be disruptive and hard on the party as well as the nominee.”
Adding to questions about whether some kind of face-off is in the works, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told The Las Vegas Review-Journal recently that Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and he spoke and “things are being done” to resolve the ongoing battle. He did not elaborate on what those “things” might be.
In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins.
“I think this has been a great campaign. The Democratic problem will be over before the convention, and I think it will all work out well for America,” he said during an interview in his Reno office. Reid did not amplify to the AP how the race would be resolved before the convention.
Reid’s remarks have prompted questions about whether the contest will be sorted out by party higher-ups ahead of the convention. Reid’s spokesman said that is not the plan.
The call Reid placed to Dean was more “routine” and not about any specific plan, the spokesman said, adding Reid was merely getting “a lay of the land.” Asked about what Reid’s role would be in helping determine the nominee, the spokesman said he is sticking to his commitment to remain a “neutral observer” in the race. Reid is a superdelegate who has not yet endorsed a candidate.
Reid’s spokesman added that he suspects Dean is weighing some kind of pre-convention plan.
“I think it’s a no-brainer that he is,” he said, adding that Dean is also struggling with how to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.
But a Democratic Party official told FOXNews.com that Dean has not endorsed the idea of an earlier event to decide the nominee and confirmed the mundane nature of Dean and Reid’s phone conversation.
Democratic strategist Steve Murphy, who worked on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign, told FOXNews.com that Dean needs to urge the party’s superdelegates to make a choice and soon.
“Ask the chairman of the party to play an active role,” he said. “There’s no reason why he can’t ask them to announce their decision in June.”
Murphy said he discussed the issue of holding a superdelegate primary with Bredesen, and agrees that they should reach a decision soon so that the party could “move forward into the general election.”
But Murphy cautioned it would be difficult to hold a formal gathering.
“It’s very difficult to have a formal meeting or have the superdelegates vote somehow formally before the convention simply because the convention is the highest authority in the Democratic Party and you can’t pre-empt it,” he said.
On Wednesday, more than a dozen wealthy donors who support Clinton wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, chiding her for suggesting in a television interview last week that superdelegates have an obligation to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates. They argued that the point of having superdelegates is so they can exercise their own judgment.
“Superdelegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. … Superdelegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election,” the donors wrote.
“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional, independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August,” the letter continues.
The Obama campaign called the letter “inappropriate” and Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi is “confident” superdelegates will choose one candidate before the August convention.
And the House speaker is standing her ground on the issue.
“The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes,” Daly said.
FOX News’ Cristina Corbin, Trish Turner and Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.





It is quite evident to see at what length Hillary Clinton will go to win. She has become desperate and now has her “wealthy” supporters threatening Pelosi to back off. The Clintons need to be in that white house, almost as if they deserve it, and they will stop on nothing. The reason there is a tenure for presidents is to bring new faces, new ideas to the American People. We got it with Bush, Then Clinton, then Bush again. What does America want a dictatorship? I say we bring new ideas, new vision to the American people.
Why does it seem that the Clinton MAchine is in operation yet again? This time with their supporters trying to buy the nomination and threaten the party. I used to support Clinton (Bill Clinton), but it seems H. Clinton is all about power and doesn’t care how she gets it (why else would she run for office in other states than her own all part of the master plan) even if it means tearing the Party apart… I think we need to be reminded that it wasn’t Hilary in the White House it was Bill and she was First Lady just like all the others that held that honorable position. However she wasn’t the one sitting in the chair or making the decisions. If she will tear the party apart for her political ends, what will she do to the country to further her careers to make a statement in history.
Each day I watch the news or read the papers there appears to be a different H. Clinton, I’m not sure what flaovr I’m getting for the day or hour, which one is she?
She’ll do anything to win and that’s pretty evident to me and she doesn’t care about anyone or anything on her path there. Think about this most of the support she has is because of her husband not because of her and even though Bill did a lot of good in the 90’s, he also did a lot of harm and I for one am not ready for another CLinton in the White House as President.
Tee
I am concerned as to why this governor of Tennessee is pushing for a hasty decision by the superdelegates.He is not the only superdelegate involved.There are many others.If the voters have a decision in this matter,which it appears that we do not,then we should question the motives of Gov.Bredesen. This story states that Bredesen wants to head the show with this Murphy guy who led the campaign for Richardson in New Mexico. Now, listen carefully,Murphy is connected with Richardson-Bredesen is connected with Murphy-Richardson did not yield to the wishes of the voters in his state who wanted Hillary on the ticket-Could this mean that Bredesen will not go with the wishes of his state to back Hillary Clinton? She won heavily in Tennessee. Even though Bredesen “SAYS” that he is uncommitted ,then why is he so set on a hasty decision? Is he going to suddenly look into his inner self and quickly decide? I don’t think so!The story also states that Mr.Obama, who is supported by Richardson against the New Mexico majority of voters, is solidly behind this idea.Put these facts together and here is what you come up with:Richardson,Murphy,Bredesen=Obama.Of course this cannot be fair to Hillary who has been working hard to land this on her own.The superdelegates should not make their decisions until the convention as has been the way to go in the past.Of course these are only my opinions and if Gov.Bredesen wants to say that what I have said is not true;then we will just watch him to see who he supports. It could be that the people who want Obama as the candidate are afraid that if the fight goes on until August; there maybe some more interesting news about Sen.Obama and his views and associations that may lead to his defeat.
If Speaker Pelosi thinks it’s okay to change the rules for the superdelegates in the midst of the election process in order to facilitate the nomination, then it should also be OKAY FOR THE FLORIDAY PRIMARY TO BE CONSIDERED VALID & OUR DELEGATES SEATED ACCORDINGLY. If one rule can be changed than why not another? If my Florida vote is not counted - ONCE AGAIN - then I see no point in voting anymore, including in November!!!
So, the big question remains in the air. Will the super delegates go with the results of the primary elections, i.e., the voters? Or, will they go the way the ringleaders of the Democratic Party want them to? In any case, this should be an interesting study into the Party’s version of Democracy.
If the DNC has the resources to hold a “special” June meeting for the super delegates to vote and decide… but they don’t have the 5 million to hold the revote in florida???
I’m sure after they pay for the flights and lodging and meals and booze and the resources for the “special” convention.. the cost of it will be in excess of $10 million… that’s 795 super delegates!!!
If you want “super delegates” you have to live with them. shouldn’t they vote their conscience? Would you want somebody demanding that you have to vote a certain way regardless of your convictions?
What they are doing is conspiring to preempt the convention. It’s been going on for a while. The Obama backers were calling for the election to end in February! It’s ridiculous. Dean and his cronies at the DNC & Obama blocking 2 states and removing ALL the delgates just adds to the parties silliness.
People try to blame it on Hillary which is stupid. She’s just trying to run for office and the party has already decided what should happen and are trying everything in their power to over ride the election process. They stink!
This will need to be settled in the Democratic National Convention. I find the idea that the superdelegates should automatically go the way of the majority stupid. If that was the case, why have a minimum number of delegates required to win the nomination. If it is simply the majority of delegates at the start of the convention, as some are saying, then there is no reason to have a required number of delegates. The Superdelegates are not used to simply mirror the popular vote. The Superdelegates should be there to offset some of the emotion of the popular vote and look at who would be the best for the party and for the country. The Superdelegates need to make their decision based on their standards and ideals, not whimp out and simply go with the popular vote.
It does not matter because I am one of about 33 I can count that know if Clinton is not on the ticket then it is McCain we must vote for.