Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee

Border

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is among those working to resolve the prolonged Democratic primary battle before the August convention. (AP Photo)

Democratic officials are rapidly concluding that their party won’t have a presidential nominee ahead of the August national convention, despite increasing concerns that the party could be torn asunder if it doesn’t settle its race soon.

Few are holding out hope that the remaining contests will offer a clear-cut choice between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton has 1,499 pledged delegates to Obama’s 1,620 and the 10 contests still to be held don’t provide either candidate a foreseeable avenue to the nomination. The nominee needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nod.

With no expected solution at hand to hold new contests in Michigan and Florida — seen as states that could help clear a path to a choice — superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.

That means trying to pin down commitments before the Aug. 25-28 convention so that Democrats can remain competitive against Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain. But creating some kind of end-game ahead of the convention creates a new source of debate.

Prominent officials and lawmakers are discounting the idea of a pre-convention event that could be used to broker a deal among the superdelegates. That possibility gained wide attention last week when two-term Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested that Democrats hold a “superdelegate primary” over the course of two days in a neutral city this June.

Bredesen, who fears that a long-drawn-out battle will jeopardize his party’s chances of recapturing the White House come November, has called for the party’s 795 superdelegates to meet to hear from the two Democratic presidential hopefuls one last time before making a decision.

“No one wants this to come down to the superdelegates, but if we get to the first week of June and there’s still no clear winner we need to break the gridlock well before the convention. A superdelegate primary is a logical last resort that gets us to a decision sooner rather than later,” Bredesen said in a statement to FOXNews.com.

Obama said Wednesday he liked Bredesen’s suggestion: “I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful as opposed to having this drag on for two more months all the way up to the convention. I think that would be disruptive and hard on the party as well as the nominee.”

Adding to questions about whether some kind of face-off is in the works, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told The Las Vegas Review-Journal recently that Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and he spoke and “things are being done” to resolve the ongoing battle. He did not elaborate on what those “things” might be.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins.

“I think this has been a great campaign. The Democratic problem will be over before the convention, and I think it will all work out well for America,” he said during an interview in his Reno office. Reid did not amplify to the AP how the race would be resolved before the convention.

Reid’s remarks have prompted questions about whether the contest will be sorted out by party higher-ups ahead of the convention. Reid’s spokesman said that is not the plan.

The call Reid placed to Dean was more “routine” and not about any specific plan, the spokesman said, adding Reid was merely getting “a lay of the land.” Asked about what Reid’s role would be in helping determine the nominee, the spokesman said he is sticking to his commitment to remain a “neutral observer” in the race. Reid is a superdelegate who has not yet endorsed a candidate.

Reid’s spokesman added that he suspects Dean is weighing some kind of pre-convention plan.

“I think it’s a no-brainer that he is,” he said, adding that Dean is also struggling with how to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.

But a Democratic Party official told FOXNews.com that Dean has not endorsed the idea of an earlier event to decide the nominee and confirmed the mundane nature of Dean and Reid’s phone conversation.

Democratic strategist Steve Murphy, who worked on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign, told FOXNews.com that Dean needs to urge the party’s superdelegates to make a choice and soon.

“Ask the chairman of the party to play an active role,” he said. “There’s no reason why he can’t ask them to announce their decision in June.”

Murphy said he discussed the issue of holding a superdelegate primary with Bredesen, and agrees that they should reach a decision soon so that the party could “move forward into the general election.”

But Murphy cautioned it would be difficult to hold a formal gathering.

“It’s very difficult to have a formal meeting or have the superdelegates vote somehow formally before the convention simply because the convention is the highest authority in the Democratic Party and you can’t pre-empt it,” he said.

On Wednesday, more than a dozen wealthy donors who support Clinton wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, chiding her for suggesting in a television interview last week that superdelegates have an obligation to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates. They argued that the point of having superdelegates is so they can exercise their own judgment.

“Superdelegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. … Superdelegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election,” the donors wrote.

“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional, independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August,” the letter continues.

The Obama campaign called the letter “inappropriate” and Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi is “confident” superdelegates will choose one candidate before the August convention.

And the House speaker is standing her ground on the issue.

“The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes,” Daly said.

FOX News’ Cristina Corbin, Trish Turner and Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

124 Responses to “Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee”

Pages: « 1311 10 9 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Patrick

So now we know how Hillary is going to STEAL the nomination. We also know how the DNC and our politicians feel about the will of the people. They don’t care who has the most votes (cast by the very people who put them in office). I can see the Clinton political machine doing thier under the table dirty dealings a pulling the nomination out from under Obama even though he is the people’s choice. I don’t care how slim a margin he holds at the end of the primaries, if the majority of people have voted for Obama he is the rightfull candidate.

We, the people, of the Democratic party didn’t have a choice in how the rules for the Primary elections we established but once done that should be it. Hillary nor anyone else should be favored just because it isn’t going the way they (the Clintons) want. Michigan and Floriday were not going to be counted, as stated a year ago, so leave them out. Instead of using the “Super delegates” why not just throw them out alltogether and who ever has the most pledged delegates and number of popular votes after the last primary gets the nomination.. I guess that would be way too simply democratic for the democratic Party…..

 
Comment by john from ct

What’s the difference frick or frack,clinton or obama,two losers with nothing but the same old socialist garbage

 
Comment by Douglas

Let us in Michigan and Florida vote or count our votes! This is the most unamerican thing i can think of that has or could ever happen to me as a proud american(Yes i have always been proud of America)! Howard Dean nees to get off his Obama KoolAid and do what is right for the party and what’s right for all Americans not just part of the Americans, LET MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA’S VOTES COUNT OR DO A REDO PRIMARY!

 
Comment by ej

The Super Delegates must vote their conscience. I know the Obama campaign says they should vote like their state went but then they don’t want Kennedy, Kerry or Richardson to do the same. They are not going to play fair in this so the Super Delegates have GOT to step up to the plate and do what is right for our country. They now know that at least 25+% of Clinton supporters will vote McCain if Obama gets the nomination. IF THEY WANT A DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2008, they must put their support behind Clinton. They’d have to be deaf, dum, blind and a little stupid not to see that. It’s quite a simple deduction.

 
Comment by ted

And these same dems want to compel a universal health care plan for all people in this country. thats a laugh. they cant even run their own nomination process to select a candidate. Watching them try to resolve their mess is more fun then watching a barrel of monkeys.

 
Comment by Steve

Come on, Democratic Party!!!!!!!!!! Look at your name! Democratic!

You decided to have proportional selection of delegates to give ALL states the chance to influence the outcome of the nomination and now you are eager to end the thing prematurely? There is no problem with going to the convention without a nominee. The base is energized, turnout is great, money is flowing in in record sums and the two candidates are in the press all the time. McCain has no idea who his opponent will be, so he has to wait before he can announce his VP. If he announces early, the Dems can react to that.

If the party thinks that a casting show à la American (political) Idol will help, why not. I think that the Democratic party has to make sure that all states have their say. Stopping the process before the convention means bad blood, putting pressure on either candidate to drop out will split the party. See how it all turns out in Denver.

If Pelosi, Dean, Reid or Bredesen are bored already, why not sit down and find a solution for Florida and Michigan? There is enough money and time to resolve the problem, so get going!!!!

 
Comment by Jeff

If the superdelegats override Obama’s lead and choose Hillary they will derserve the outrage that will insue

 
Comment by Bill

I can see it now. A large smoke filled room full of wealthy “superdelegates”, appointed by the
DNC and in debt to the former President WJC, all primarily concerned with their own re election and the Hell with everything else! Yes sir, that’s what the founding fathers intended all right.
To quote; “I’m in it and I’m in it to win”…HRC. Obama supporter’s; get ready for your day
cometh!

 
Comment by R Whitson

Operation Kaos is working great! You dems now get to experience a long nightmare, and I for one am glad to be observing it!

 
Comment by Chris in O.C.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins. (except that one is a woman and one is black)

How goofy is the Democratic Party?

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It