Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee

Border

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is among those working to resolve the prolonged Democratic primary battle before the August convention. (AP Photo)

Democratic officials are rapidly concluding that their party won’t have a presidential nominee ahead of the August national convention, despite increasing concerns that the party could be torn asunder if it doesn’t settle its race soon.

Few are holding out hope that the remaining contests will offer a clear-cut choice between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton has 1,499 pledged delegates to Obama’s 1,620 and the 10 contests still to be held don’t provide either candidate a foreseeable avenue to the nomination. The nominee needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nod.

With no expected solution at hand to hold new contests in Michigan and Florida — seen as states that could help clear a path to a choice — superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.

That means trying to pin down commitments before the Aug. 25-28 convention so that Democrats can remain competitive against Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain. But creating some kind of end-game ahead of the convention creates a new source of debate.

Prominent officials and lawmakers are discounting the idea of a pre-convention event that could be used to broker a deal among the superdelegates. That possibility gained wide attention last week when two-term Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested that Democrats hold a “superdelegate primary” over the course of two days in a neutral city this June.

Bredesen, who fears that a long-drawn-out battle will jeopardize his party’s chances of recapturing the White House come November, has called for the party’s 795 superdelegates to meet to hear from the two Democratic presidential hopefuls one last time before making a decision.

“No one wants this to come down to the superdelegates, but if we get to the first week of June and there’s still no clear winner we need to break the gridlock well before the convention. A superdelegate primary is a logical last resort that gets us to a decision sooner rather than later,” Bredesen said in a statement to FOXNews.com.

Obama said Wednesday he liked Bredesen’s suggestion: “I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful as opposed to having this drag on for two more months all the way up to the convention. I think that would be disruptive and hard on the party as well as the nominee.”

Adding to questions about whether some kind of face-off is in the works, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told The Las Vegas Review-Journal recently that Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and he spoke and “things are being done” to resolve the ongoing battle. He did not elaborate on what those “things” might be.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins.

“I think this has been a great campaign. The Democratic problem will be over before the convention, and I think it will all work out well for America,” he said during an interview in his Reno office. Reid did not amplify to the AP how the race would be resolved before the convention.

Reid’s remarks have prompted questions about whether the contest will be sorted out by party higher-ups ahead of the convention. Reid’s spokesman said that is not the plan.

The call Reid placed to Dean was more “routine” and not about any specific plan, the spokesman said, adding Reid was merely getting “a lay of the land.” Asked about what Reid’s role would be in helping determine the nominee, the spokesman said he is sticking to his commitment to remain a “neutral observer” in the race. Reid is a superdelegate who has not yet endorsed a candidate.

Reid’s spokesman added that he suspects Dean is weighing some kind of pre-convention plan.

“I think it’s a no-brainer that he is,” he said, adding that Dean is also struggling with how to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.

But a Democratic Party official told FOXNews.com that Dean has not endorsed the idea of an earlier event to decide the nominee and confirmed the mundane nature of Dean and Reid’s phone conversation.

Democratic strategist Steve Murphy, who worked on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign, told FOXNews.com that Dean needs to urge the party’s superdelegates to make a choice and soon.

“Ask the chairman of the party to play an active role,” he said. “There’s no reason why he can’t ask them to announce their decision in June.”

Murphy said he discussed the issue of holding a superdelegate primary with Bredesen, and agrees that they should reach a decision soon so that the party could “move forward into the general election.”

But Murphy cautioned it would be difficult to hold a formal gathering.

“It’s very difficult to have a formal meeting or have the superdelegates vote somehow formally before the convention simply because the convention is the highest authority in the Democratic Party and you can’t pre-empt it,” he said.

On Wednesday, more than a dozen wealthy donors who support Clinton wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, chiding her for suggesting in a television interview last week that superdelegates have an obligation to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates. They argued that the point of having superdelegates is so they can exercise their own judgment.

“Superdelegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. … Superdelegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election,” the donors wrote.

“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional, independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August,” the letter continues.

The Obama campaign called the letter “inappropriate” and Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi is “confident” superdelegates will choose one candidate before the August convention.

And the House speaker is standing her ground on the issue.

“The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes,” Daly said.

FOX News’ Cristina Corbin, Trish Turner and Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

124 Responses to “Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee”

Pages: « 1311 10 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by David

As a Republican I always thought the Democrats were a national Joke who would sell this Country out at the drop of a hat. But I was wrong, The Democratic Party is a WorldWide Joke and Everyday I sit back eat some popcorn and watch this comedy unfold.

Barack Obama is clearly out for the Black Community as he struggles with his own identity crisis, whereas the “Black” man was no where around as usual to help raise him.

Hilliary Clinton, The socialist who has no clue what sniper fire is.

What of Michigan and Florida? They clearly voted for Hilliary, the fact Obama does not want re-elections there as he is on the record as of last week stating shows how scared he is of a bigger repeat.

The Democrats are so pre occupied with the losing fight they forget that come November they stand a BIG chance of losing the house and senate over unkept promisises and a most unproductive 2 years.

I hope Obama does become the nominee, If Kerry thinks he was swift boated in 04 wait till Obama gets pinned to his idiot pastor.

Its a good time to be a Republican watching the Democratic party in it’s Death Throes

 
Comment by Bruce Boettger

If the Democrats can’t manage their own party nomination how can they be expected to manage an entire nation? This race has demonstrated their incompetency.

 
Comment by Gary W Davis

There is no question that the longer this pot is left on the burner the more it will boil over. I support Obama so I will make that clear up front. That considered, he now leads in the popular vote, the delegate count and the number of states won. Realistically, that will not change without the intrusion of the super delegates. The states of Florida and Michigan are serving their sentence. They were warned, they defied, and now they are denied. Case closed. If not, what will prevent future incidents like this? Their respective voters are free to cast their vote in the general election in reflection of their mindset. The matter needs to be addressed however it needs to be honestly and openly resolved. No back-room tactics. And, it needs to be handled very soon. It may seem like ions until Pennsylvania but as we all know, June is just around the corner and August burns bright in the distance.

 
Comment by William Smith

Why don’t the democrats leave it up to the supreme court? I’m sure one of those creative type lawyers could dream up an action to get this going.

 
Comment by Kate

They won’t clarify because they are Obama supporters who want to steal the election. 1st disenfranchise 2 Clinton states and then speak up and make Super Delegates appear to be something they are NOT. Then take away the convention with a meeting or phone survey to have them chose prior and take the choice totally away. Them DNC & Democratic party are nothing any more.

 
Comment by PulSamsara

If Clinton throws her sleaze around and steals the nomination… I’m walking away from the part - for good.

 
Comment by Pat

How can the Democratic Party keep tripping the “sutpid” wire? Will they never learn? To have a meeting of super delegates to decide on a candidate PRIOR to ALL of the Primaries would be a slap in the face of voters in the remaining states! Yep - way to go dummies! You are showing people why they really shouldn’t trust the Democratic Party anymore - Florida and Michican voter denial has already left a bad taste in our mouths and now this! One could have blamed the DNC Chairman for this before, but now you all are acting like mongrel dogs after a soup bone! Can you spell M-C-C-A-I-N? Better learn, cause you are pushing people towards him!

Pat in MS

 
Comment by HB

Nothing quite like making up the rules as you go along and then having 600+ insiders ready to cast deciding votes and nullify all the primaries. the democratic party is a total disgrace. They have been so overly concerned wit winning elections that they have forgotten to actually do any work. Wht is most amusing is that they are prepariung to disenfranchise the very voters who they said were disenfranchised in the last election.

 
Comment by NewYorkLady

“— superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.”

I still don’t get it. Who died and left these 796 Super Delegates in charge. I voted for the current leader in delegates and who will end up at the end with the most delegates.

I don’t want my vote NULLIFIED at the convention or worse yet before the convention by a Superdelegate.

The “Super Delegates” had better consider they need to uphold the legacies of Jefferson, Madison and Jackson. They had better ask themselves if Thomas Jefferson, James Madison or Andrew Jackson would ever consider overturning the will of the majority of people.

 
Comment by Nat

Nancy Pelosi is suppose to be neutral…Obviously she is not and has spoken out way too often with support of Obama…She is the worst type of woman leader, she cannot support another strong woman…ALL Women should be enbracing this historic campain of Hillary Clinton’s… Come on Ladies lets support one of our own!

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It