Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is among those working to resolve the prolonged Democratic primary battle before the August convention. (AP Photo)
Democratic officials are rapidly concluding that their party won’t have a presidential nominee ahead of the August national convention, despite increasing concerns that the party could be torn asunder if it doesn’t settle its race soon.
Few are holding out hope that the remaining contests will offer a clear-cut choice between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton has 1,499 pledged delegates to Obama’s 1,620 and the 10 contests still to be held don’t provide either candidate a foreseeable avenue to the nomination. The nominee needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nod.
With no expected solution at hand to hold new contests in Michigan and Florida — seen as states that could help clear a path to a choice — superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.
That means trying to pin down commitments before the Aug. 25-28 convention so that Democrats can remain competitive against Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain. But creating some kind of end-game ahead of the convention creates a new source of debate.
Prominent officials and lawmakers are discounting the idea of a pre-convention event that could be used to broker a deal among the superdelegates. That possibility gained wide attention last week when two-term Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested that Democrats hold a “superdelegate primary” over the course of two days in a neutral city this June.
Bredesen, who fears that a long-drawn-out battle will jeopardize his party’s chances of recapturing the White House come November, has called for the party’s 795 superdelegates to meet to hear from the two Democratic presidential hopefuls one last time before making a decision.
“No one wants this to come down to the superdelegates, but if we get to the first week of June and there’s still no clear winner we need to break the gridlock well before the convention. A superdelegate primary is a logical last resort that gets us to a decision sooner rather than later,” Bredesen said in a statement to FOXNews.com.
Obama said Wednesday he liked Bredesen’s suggestion: “I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful as opposed to having this drag on for two more months all the way up to the convention. I think that would be disruptive and hard on the party as well as the nominee.”
Adding to questions about whether some kind of face-off is in the works, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told The Las Vegas Review-Journal recently that Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and he spoke and “things are being done” to resolve the ongoing battle. He did not elaborate on what those “things” might be.
In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins.
“I think this has been a great campaign. The Democratic problem will be over before the convention, and I think it will all work out well for America,” he said during an interview in his Reno office. Reid did not amplify to the AP how the race would be resolved before the convention.
Reid’s remarks have prompted questions about whether the contest will be sorted out by party higher-ups ahead of the convention. Reid’s spokesman said that is not the plan.
The call Reid placed to Dean was more “routine” and not about any specific plan, the spokesman said, adding Reid was merely getting “a lay of the land.” Asked about what Reid’s role would be in helping determine the nominee, the spokesman said he is sticking to his commitment to remain a “neutral observer” in the race. Reid is a superdelegate who has not yet endorsed a candidate.
Reid’s spokesman added that he suspects Dean is weighing some kind of pre-convention plan.
“I think it’s a no-brainer that he is,” he said, adding that Dean is also struggling with how to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.
But a Democratic Party official told FOXNews.com that Dean has not endorsed the idea of an earlier event to decide the nominee and confirmed the mundane nature of Dean and Reid’s phone conversation.
Democratic strategist Steve Murphy, who worked on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign, told FOXNews.com that Dean needs to urge the party’s superdelegates to make a choice and soon.
“Ask the chairman of the party to play an active role,” he said. “There’s no reason why he can’t ask them to announce their decision in June.”
Murphy said he discussed the issue of holding a superdelegate primary with Bredesen, and agrees that they should reach a decision soon so that the party could “move forward into the general election.”
But Murphy cautioned it would be difficult to hold a formal gathering.
“It’s very difficult to have a formal meeting or have the superdelegates vote somehow formally before the convention simply because the convention is the highest authority in the Democratic Party and you can’t pre-empt it,” he said.
On Wednesday, more than a dozen wealthy donors who support Clinton wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, chiding her for suggesting in a television interview last week that superdelegates have an obligation to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates. They argued that the point of having superdelegates is so they can exercise their own judgment.
“Superdelegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. … Superdelegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election,” the donors wrote.
“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional, independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August,” the letter continues.
The Obama campaign called the letter “inappropriate” and Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi is “confident” superdelegates will choose one candidate before the August convention.
And the House speaker is standing her ground on the issue.
“The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes,” Daly said.
FOX News’ Cristina Corbin, Trish Turner and Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.





It looks like there is no way this is going to be settled even with the Supers. It would be bet that the Democratic party in general pull the plug and give up support of one of the candidates giving the other the nomination without additional bickering. The party is already split with Obama being the leader far in front of Clinton so he should get the nod from the Party Headquarters.
Clinton will continue to lag behind even if she wins in Pa.
Time for Hillary to Concede to B.H.Obama and revive the party before McCain takes all from these two candidates.
I still belive McCain will be our next President regardless of what the split party will do. The reason is that the party does not want to heal old wounds.Esp.the Clinton crowd.
One way to get the job done is to count the FL and MI votes!! That would be the fair thing to do
This is very typical in America — no one wants to wait. You are all a bunch of kids that want mommy or daddy to buy this or that. Democracy does not run its course when its the back rooms that do the work. You’ve said all along that you want the PEOPLE’s vote and voice to count, why in the he.. don’t you let the darn primaries and caucuses take place where they are scheduled!.
You wonder why Michigan and Florida bucked the rules and held their primaries early?! Well, here’s the reason why, poor Pennsylvania and the other states can’t even get a chance to hear the candidates, let alone vote, and the pressure is being put on the superdelegates to make a choice.
Thought superdelegates were to make their choice after the people voted!
Perhaps we ought to have a discussion with changing the Democratic primary procedure and just let Dean and his groupies decide who the nominee is, and stop wasting millions of money and TV time to have the people vote. Doesn’t seem that it matters to those in Washington.
And by the way — both candidates are not “essentially the same” Reid — and THAT IS THE REASON PEOPLE VOTE!
I suggest the “Democratic (BOY ! There’s a misnomer !) Party” change their name to a more accurate one, such as the “Smoke Filled Room Hacks Party”.
Wow! Pelosi is taking heat from others in her own party about how the super delegates should function in their role of selecting their nominee!
Now that’s good stuff!
Hilary needs to quit. She is squawking into the wind and nobody, not
even her advisors, but her and Bill want to fight this out against all
costs. There is no shame in Clintonville.
So, someone please remind me why we bother to vote in the primaries when the decision ultimately rests in the hands of these ’superdelegates’. In this day of near instantaneous communications, why can’t we have a Nationwide public referendum and all vote on ALL of the candidates on the same day? I know, I know. Too many people are raking too much cash throughout the entire process for the powers that be to want to kill such a huge cash cow.
I’m especially annoyed because by the time this obscenely expensive farce rolled around to Wisconsin there was no one left worth voting for. Why does someone from Iowa or Vermont have the right to have more say in who runs for president than me, or the guy in Hawaii, or the woman in wherever? Explain to me exactly how that’s constitutional.
This system is so corrupt and broken and all the sheep just keep bleating and soaking up the campaign promises. Maybe one day we’ll wise up and actually start holding these professional politicians to their promises. Maybe we’ll turn off reality TV for long enough to vote the bums out of office. Nah. What was I thinking?
its true that super delegates have a responsibility to “not follow the leader” and make their own educated decision on who will be best to bring their party into power, and will also not embarrass the party down the road. Superdelegates should not follow the will of other voters. I know this election is ugly but thats just the way it is, nothing they can do will change that.
Nancy Pelosi disappointed me very much recently by publicly commenting on superdelegates as well as dream team suggestion. She clearly biased towards to Obama with her own hidden agenda. Now I truely know what a “real” liberal dem looks like.
I fail to see the problem with the current state of the Democratic campaign between Senator’s Clinton and Obama. As someone who has voted Democratic for President in EVERY election since 1980, I am glad that it has lasted this long. If it had wrapped up on super tuesday, I’d not have learned that Senator Obama belongs to a separatist church and had a Pastor for 20 years who he had hoped would not have become widely known to potential voters. The only reason he gave “The Speech” was because of the Pastor’s videos being seen by the whole country. If he really intended to open such a courageous discussion on race, he would not have waited until the truth about him, his church, and his preacher became common knowledge.
What is the Democratic leadership afraid of? Are they afraid of the rest of us Democratic voters learning more troubling information about Obama??? I, as a lifelong Democratic votor, greatly resent this rush to nominate Obama, and promise that I will vote for John McCain if the process is not allowed to play out to its conclusion, either by one candidate earning the required delegates, or for one candidate pulling out of his or her own accord.
As for Florida and Michigan, it is the fault of the DNC, because it was them who stripped the delegates. The Republicans had the good sense not to strip delegates, and avoided the real risk of angry party votors simply voting for the other party in November’s general election. I know if i was a Florida or Michigan voter and had taken the time and effort to vote in the primary, only to have the DNC tell me that my state will not have delegates representing me at the Democratic National Convention, I would vote Republican in November out of spite!