Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee

Border

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is among those working to resolve the prolonged Democratic primary battle before the August convention. (AP Photo)

Democratic officials are rapidly concluding that their party won’t have a presidential nominee ahead of the August national convention, despite increasing concerns that the party could be torn asunder if it doesn’t settle its race soon.

Few are holding out hope that the remaining contests will offer a clear-cut choice between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton has 1,499 pledged delegates to Obama’s 1,620 and the 10 contests still to be held don’t provide either candidate a foreseeable avenue to the nomination. The nominee needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nod.

With no expected solution at hand to hold new contests in Michigan and Florida — seen as states that could help clear a path to a choice — superdelegates appear more and more likely to be the only way out.

That means trying to pin down commitments before the Aug. 25-28 convention so that Democrats can remain competitive against Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain. But creating some kind of end-game ahead of the convention creates a new source of debate.

Prominent officials and lawmakers are discounting the idea of a pre-convention event that could be used to broker a deal among the superdelegates. That possibility gained wide attention last week when two-term Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested that Democrats hold a “superdelegate primary” over the course of two days in a neutral city this June.

Bredesen, who fears that a long-drawn-out battle will jeopardize his party’s chances of recapturing the White House come November, has called for the party’s 795 superdelegates to meet to hear from the two Democratic presidential hopefuls one last time before making a decision.

“No one wants this to come down to the superdelegates, but if we get to the first week of June and there’s still no clear winner we need to break the gridlock well before the convention. A superdelegate primary is a logical last resort that gets us to a decision sooner rather than later,” Bredesen said in a statement to FOXNews.com.

Obama said Wednesday he liked Bredesen’s suggestion: “I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful as opposed to having this drag on for two more months all the way up to the convention. I think that would be disruptive and hard on the party as well as the nominee.”

Adding to questions about whether some kind of face-off is in the works, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told The Las Vegas Review-Journal recently that Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and he spoke and “things are being done” to resolve the ongoing battle. He did not elaborate on what those “things” might be.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Reid said the two candidates are essentially the same so really it doesn’t matter who wins.

“I think this has been a great campaign. The Democratic problem will be over before the convention, and I think it will all work out well for America,” he said during an interview in his Reno office. Reid did not amplify to the AP how the race would be resolved before the convention.

Reid’s remarks have prompted questions about whether the contest will be sorted out by party higher-ups ahead of the convention. Reid’s spokesman said that is not the plan.

The call Reid placed to Dean was more “routine” and not about any specific plan, the spokesman said, adding Reid was merely getting “a lay of the land.” Asked about what Reid’s role would be in helping determine the nominee, the spokesman said he is sticking to his commitment to remain a “neutral observer” in the race. Reid is a superdelegate who has not yet endorsed a candidate.

Reid’s spokesman added that he suspects Dean is weighing some kind of pre-convention plan.

“I think it’s a no-brainer that he is,” he said, adding that Dean is also struggling with how to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.

But a Democratic Party official told FOXNews.com that Dean has not endorsed the idea of an earlier event to decide the nominee and confirmed the mundane nature of Dean and Reid’s phone conversation.

Democratic strategist Steve Murphy, who worked on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign, told FOXNews.com that Dean needs to urge the party’s superdelegates to make a choice and soon.

“Ask the chairman of the party to play an active role,” he said. “There’s no reason why he can’t ask them to announce their decision in June.”

Murphy said he discussed the issue of holding a superdelegate primary with Bredesen, and agrees that they should reach a decision soon so that the party could “move forward into the general election.”

But Murphy cautioned it would be difficult to hold a formal gathering.

“It’s very difficult to have a formal meeting or have the superdelegates vote somehow formally before the convention simply because the convention is the highest authority in the Democratic Party and you can’t pre-empt it,” he said.

On Wednesday, more than a dozen wealthy donors who support Clinton wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, chiding her for suggesting in a television interview last week that superdelegates have an obligation to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates. They argued that the point of having superdelegates is so they can exercise their own judgment.

“Superdelegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. … Superdelegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election,” the donors wrote.

“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional, independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August,” the letter continues.

The Obama campaign called the letter “inappropriate” and Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi is “confident” superdelegates will choose one candidate before the August convention.

And the House speaker is standing her ground on the issue.

“The Speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes,” Daly said.

FOX News’ Cristina Corbin, Trish Turner and Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

124 Responses to “Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee”

Pages: « 13 12 11 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 31 » Show All

Comment by Dennis O. Lamb

Once again the “Good Ole Boy” system is proving to be alive and well and working in politics.

This process of now choosing to manipulate the Super Delegates is just an example of the well entrenched politicians saying “we will listen to the voters, maybe, until we decide they do not know what they are doing…. and then we will tell them what they really need to do.”

The Super Delegates need to go with the choice of the voters from their respective states and honor their wishes. To try and change the vote by the use of these types of votes essentially tells the voters they are idiots and the Democratic Party is looking out for their welfare….

Lest see what Fox News can do to bring this to light…. Let the Democratic voters see what their leadership is really doing for them.

 
Comment by Ken

If the normal media (Fox not included) would wake up and recognize these Democratic candidates for what they are which is a compulsive liar and an unaccomplished man with a racist mentor this election would be over. Biden and Dodd are accomplished men and they never stood a chance because it is all about appearances charm and name recognition in the Dem elite.

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute new government…

I think it’s time. Don’t you?

Even if McCain wins we still have a government working for themselves not the American people…wouldn’t you all agree?

 
Comment by norton

…..Dingy Harry did say that any deeded property recently transfered to Dr. Dean would have no influence on the outcome.

 
Comment by Hillalry

I am Hillary - hear me Lie! I will lie, cheat and steal — it is the American Way! Just look what it did for my husband. I’m here to tell you that it doesn’t matter what I say or do, I will do it to win! I’ll pull a Tonya Harding if I have to. I don’t care who I hurt to get into the Oval Office. The People don’t matter. The Party doesn’t matter. Only I matter.

 
Comment by sja

“On Wednesday more than a dozen wealthy Clinton supporter superdelegates contacted Pelosi”? Sounds like Bill is at it again!!!!

 
Comment by karen

As someone who supported Bill Clinton through two elections and in spite of a major series of sccandals, I now say enough. At first I even thought of Hilary for VP, but now seeing the continuation of the lies and the clear manipulation of the process by Hilary, I have little respect for her or for Bill Clinton.

Indeed I am already turned off voting for anything connected with the Clintons and their backstabging, manipulation threats and insults. ENOUgh HIlary, be gracious enough to keep the party intact.

ENOUGH hilary of the media manipulation, when you don’t have a prayer of winning unless Obama goes the way of Ron Brown. Enough with the lies about sniper fire, Enough with destroying a clear victory for the Democratics to feed your ego. Enough with lies of NAFTA.

ThougH I think McCain is too old and botoxed and should be enjoying retirment with his grandkids, I would rather see him in the White House than you Hilary, and the demons surrouonding you that would destroy the party’s chances of regaining the white house. And this is from someone who originally supported you. But better came along. YOu missed your chance in 2004. Its over.

And as for this hogwash about superdelegates voting in June, that is simply another manipulation. How dumb do you think the electorate is Hilary, Bill? You keep changing the rules, you keep turning off voters. All these new voters who have been awakened from lethargy by Obama just like me will turn away indifferent. You will be left with an empty echo. But perhaps that is what you want, you know the dog in the manger, ” If Hilary can’t have it, then Obama can’t either’. Seems like that is your strategy.

Trust me, I will campaign for McCain and contribute heavily to his election in everyway possible if you win the nomination. Do you REALLY THINK I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO FEELS THIS WAY???? You cant win, because if you should get the nomination, you definitely will NOT GET THE WHITE HOUSE.

FEDUP KAREN

 
Comment by Mike Denhof

We can all thank Hillary Clinton for this problem.

Her chances of winning are nearly a statistical impossibility, and yet she continues with dirty campaign tactics against Obama, even though he is almost guaranteed to win (based on his lead in the most pledged delegates, higher popular vote, and most states won).

Her thinking seems to be “If I cant win, Obama’s not going to win either”. Why else would she be repeatedly making favorable comments about herself AND John McCain within the same sentences, and then contrasting the two of them against Obama? Why else would she (and her husband and/or their surrogates) continue to try to inject race into the contest?

She is attempting to bring down a good and very special man, and its a shame.

 
Comment by Bob

I find it amazing that the so called “ELITE” of the Democratic party wish to pre-empt the rank and file of the Democratic party. It is disgusting to me to see these people acting more like Republicans then the Republicans themselves. The Democratic party is a party of the average Joe and Jane and if the ELITE vote in anyone other then the leader in pledged delegates whether it be Hillary or Obama, I will be forced to vote Republican.

 
Comment by Travis

Anything other than giving the last person the right to vote for their choice is and will be wrong.
Everyone should have their right to vote for their nominational choice. To stop it now would be distroying apart their constitutional right to vote.

 
Comment by Steven Polley

If the superdelegates decide who will win the nomination, then both sides of the american people who voted for either one will be angry for being overridden. No matter how it comes out in the democratic party, it will be a disaster, which quite frankly suites me just find. Steve

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It