<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Look to Superdelegates for Early Resolution on Nominee</title>
	<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/</link>
	<description>America's Election HQ</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Nation</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252900</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252900</guid>
		<description>Here is a thought-why not let the Superdelegates be the only vote that matter
since the will of the voters clearly dont have a say so!
Forget the Caucuses &#38; Primaries our great citizens participate in around the Nation
Forget the Media Debates - Forget the  millions that came out to vote-Who cares what
they think! Oh by the way forget the media for all the hidden comments &#38; messages that
they  so cleverly blog the public thinking system.
The State of our Nation.....appear to be  For the Government By the Government.
A Candidate is held responsible for words that not of his own. And it just so happen that the other Candidate made up a tale that wasnt true not once not twice but three times.
WOW who here gets the most negative PRESS! You gotta Love It.............................................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a thought-why not let the Superdelegates be the only vote that matter<br />
since the will of the voters clearly dont have a say so!<br />
Forget the Caucuses &amp; Primaries our great citizens participate in around the Nation<br />
Forget the Media Debates - Forget the  millions that came out to vote-Who cares what<br />
they think! Oh by the way forget the media for all the hidden comments &amp; messages that<br />
they  so cleverly blog the public thinking system.<br />
The State of our Nation&#8230;..appear to be  For the Government By the Government.<br />
A Candidate is held responsible for words that not of his own. And it just so happen that the other Candidate made up a tale that wasnt true not once not twice but three times.<br />
WOW who here gets the most negative PRESS! You gotta Love It&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCBill</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252886</link>
		<dc:creator>DCBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252886</guid>
		<description>The DNC blew it when the disciplined Michigan and Florida.   The issues are now too tainted to consider any new elections in these states to have any credibility.  The entire superdelegate system is a abomination of our democracy.  It is like telling voters we don't care who you voted for we will decide for you.  But why should anyone be surprised.  This is the way of the liberal to treat the electorate like they are irresponsible children not capable of making decisions.  If Obama would have been on the ballot in Michigan a solution would have been to split all the delegates proportionately, including the superdelegates, based on the popular vote.  Since this is not the case and as painful as this is, the only alternative is the Michigan and Florida Democrats will have to sit this one out.  Perhaps the DNC and Democrats as a whole will learn the reason we have states' rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DNC blew it when the disciplined Michigan and Florida.   The issues are now too tainted to consider any new elections in these states to have any credibility.  The entire superdelegate system is a abomination of our democracy.  It is like telling voters we don&#8217;t care who you voted for we will decide for you.  But why should anyone be surprised.  This is the way of the liberal to treat the electorate like they are irresponsible children not capable of making decisions.  If Obama would have been on the ballot in Michigan a solution would have been to split all the delegates proportionately, including the superdelegates, based on the popular vote.  Since this is not the case and as painful as this is, the only alternative is the Michigan and Florida Democrats will have to sit this one out.  Perhaps the DNC and Democrats as a whole will learn the reason we have states&#8217; rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joann</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252865</link>
		<dc:creator>Joann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252865</guid>
		<description>If the superdeligates that were on Hillary's side don't vote for her then I'll vote Mccain - they will decide whether this party breaks up or not. It's their decision and the rules are that they vote with their own mind - their own conscience and who they think is ready on day one - not the way Obama's people are trying to say vote with the will of the people - if that's the only requirement then at this moment only, he wins; the people aren't thinking too clearly right now if this Reverand crap doesn't bother them - it sure bothers me but polls say most americans don't care if Obama refuses to distance himself from this "terrorist" pastor. No voting with the insane people and koolaid drinkers - that's changing the rules which Obama is against. Can't change the rules with Michigan and Florida - ok, can't change the rules with how the superdeligates are supposed to vote either. get over it and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the superdeligates that were on Hillary&#8217;s side don&#8217;t vote for her then I&#8217;ll vote Mccain - they will decide whether this party breaks up or not. It&#8217;s their decision and the rules are that they vote with their own mind - their own conscience and who they think is ready on day one - not the way Obama&#8217;s people are trying to say vote with the will of the people - if that&#8217;s the only requirement then at this moment only, he wins; the people aren&#8217;t thinking too clearly right now if this Reverand crap doesn&#8217;t bother them - it sure bothers me but polls say most americans don&#8217;t care if Obama refuses to distance himself from this &#8220;terrorist&#8221; pastor. No voting with the insane people and koolaid drinkers - that&#8217;s changing the rules which Obama is against. Can&#8217;t change the rules with Michigan and Florida - ok, can&#8217;t change the rules with how the superdeligates are supposed to vote either. get over it and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252818</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252818</guid>
		<description>If they don't get it done before the Convention the Party is in deep trouble!  If Obama is leading in pledged delegates and the popular vote and the SuperDelegates give it to Clinton - we will have a case of Theft OF Office, and the Convention will turn into Madison Square Garden!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t get it done before the Convention the Party is in deep trouble!  If Obama is leading in pledged delegates and the popular vote and the SuperDelegates give it to Clinton - we will have a case of Theft OF Office, and the Convention will turn into Madison Square Garden!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry S.</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252767</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252767</guid>
		<description>It is quite evident to see at what length Hillary Clinton will go to win. She has become desperate and now has her "wealthy" supporters threatening Pelosi to back off. The Clintons need to be in that white house, almost as if they deserve it, and they will stop on nothing. The reason there is a tenure for presidents is to bring new faces, new ideas to the American People. We got it with Bush, Then Clinton, then Bush again. What does America want a dictatorship? I say we bring new ideas, new vision to the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is quite evident to see at what length Hillary Clinton will go to win. She has become desperate and now has her &#8220;wealthy&#8221; supporters threatening Pelosi to back off. The Clintons need to be in that white house, almost as if they deserve it, and they will stop on nothing. The reason there is a tenure for presidents is to bring new faces, new ideas to the American People. We got it with Bush, Then Clinton, then Bush again. What does America want a dictatorship? I say we bring new ideas, new vision to the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tee</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252642</link>
		<dc:creator>Tee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252642</guid>
		<description>Why does it seem that the Clinton MAchine is in operation yet again?  This time with their supporters trying to buy the nomination and threaten the party.  I used to support Clinton (Bill Clinton), but it seems H. Clinton is all about power and doesn't care how she gets it (why else would she run for office in other states than her own all part of the master plan)  even if it means tearing the Party apart...  I think we need to be reminded that it wasn't Hilary in the White House it was Bill and she was First Lady just like all the others that held that honorable position.  However she wasn't the one sitting in the chair or making the decisions.  If she will tear the party apart for her political ends, what will she do to the country to further her careers to make a statement in history.

Each day I watch the news or read the papers there appears to be a different H. Clinton, I'm not sure what flaovr I'm getting for the day or hour, which one is she?

She'll do anything to win and that's pretty evident to me and she doesn't care about anyone or anything on her path there.  Think about this most of the support she has is because of her husband not because of her and even though Bill did a lot of good in the 90's, he also did a lot of harm and I for one am not ready for another CLinton in the White House as President.

Tee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it seem that the Clinton MAchine is in operation yet again?  This time with their supporters trying to buy the nomination and threaten the party.  I used to support Clinton (Bill Clinton), but it seems H. Clinton is all about power and doesn&#8217;t care how she gets it (why else would she run for office in other states than her own all part of the master plan)  even if it means tearing the Party apart&#8230;  I think we need to be reminded that it wasn&#8217;t Hilary in the White House it was Bill and she was First Lady just like all the others that held that honorable position.  However she wasn&#8217;t the one sitting in the chair or making the decisions.  If she will tear the party apart for her political ends, what will she do to the country to further her careers to make a statement in history.</p>
<p>Each day I watch the news or read the papers there appears to be a different H. Clinton, I&#8217;m not sure what flaovr I&#8217;m getting for the day or hour, which one is she?</p>
<p>She&#8217;ll do anything to win and that&#8217;s pretty evident to me and she doesn&#8217;t care about anyone or anything on her path there.  Think about this most of the support she has is because of her husband not because of her and even though Bill did a lot of good in the 90&#8217;s, he also did a lot of harm and I for one am not ready for another CLinton in the White House as President.</p>
<p>Tee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Supporter</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252556</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Supporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252556</guid>
		<description>I am concerned as to why this governor of Tennessee is pushing for a hasty decision by the superdelegates.He is not the only superdelegate involved.There are many others.If the voters have a decision in this matter,which it appears that we do not,then we should question the motives of Gov.Bredesen. This story states that Bredesen wants to head the show with this Murphy guy who led the campaign for Richardson in New Mexico. Now, listen carefully,Murphy is connected with Richardson-Bredesen is connected with Murphy-Richardson did not yield to the wishes of the voters in his state who wanted Hillary on the ticket-Could this mean that Bredesen will not go with the wishes of his state to back Hillary Clinton? She won heavily in Tennessee. Even though Bredesen "SAYS" that he is uncommitted ,then why is he so set on a hasty decision? Is he going to suddenly look into his inner self and quickly decide? I don't think so!The story also states that Mr.Obama, who is supported by Richardson against the New Mexico majority of voters, is solidly behind this idea.Put these facts together and here is what you come up with:Richardson,Murphy,Bredesen=Obama.Of course this cannot be fair to Hillary who has been working hard to land this on her own.The superdelegates should not make their decisions until the convention as has been the way to go in the past.Of course these are only my opinions and if Gov.Bredesen wants to say that what I have said is not true;then we will just watch him to see who he supports. It could be that the people who want Obama as the candidate are afraid that if the fight goes on until August; there maybe some more interesting news about Sen.Obama and his views and associations that may lead to his defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am concerned as to why this governor of Tennessee is pushing for a hasty decision by the superdelegates.He is not the only superdelegate involved.There are many others.If the voters have a decision in this matter,which it appears that we do not,then we should question the motives of Gov.Bredesen. This story states that Bredesen wants to head the show with this Murphy guy who led the campaign for Richardson in New Mexico. Now, listen carefully,Murphy is connected with Richardson-Bredesen is connected with Murphy-Richardson did not yield to the wishes of the voters in his state who wanted Hillary on the ticket-Could this mean that Bredesen will not go with the wishes of his state to back Hillary Clinton? She won heavily in Tennessee. Even though Bredesen &#8220;SAYS&#8221; that he is uncommitted ,then why is he so set on a hasty decision? Is he going to suddenly look into his inner self and quickly decide? I don&#8217;t think so!The story also states that Mr.Obama, who is supported by Richardson against the New Mexico majority of voters, is solidly behind this idea.Put these facts together and here is what you come up with:Richardson,Murphy,Bredesen=Obama.Of course this cannot be fair to Hillary who has been working hard to land this on her own.The superdelegates should not make their decisions until the convention as has been the way to go in the past.Of course these are only my opinions and if Gov.Bredesen wants to say that what I have said is not true;then we will just watch him to see who he supports. It could be that the people who want Obama as the candidate are afraid that if the fight goes on until August; there maybe some more interesting news about Sen.Obama and his views and associations that may lead to his defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cordero, MA, LMHC</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252435</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cordero, MA, LMHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252435</guid>
		<description>If Speaker Pelosi thinks it's okay to change the rules for the superdelegates in the midst of the election process in order to facilitate the nomination, then it should also be OKAY FOR THE FLORIDAY PRIMARY TO BE CONSIDERED VALID &#38; OUR DELEGATES SEATED ACCORDINGLY.  If one rule can be changed than why not another?  If my Florida vote is not counted - ONCE AGAIN - then I see no point in voting anymore, including in November!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Speaker Pelosi thinks it&#8217;s okay to change the rules for the superdelegates in the midst of the election process in order to facilitate the nomination, then it should also be OKAY FOR THE FLORIDAY PRIMARY TO BE CONSIDERED VALID &amp; OUR DELEGATES SEATED ACCORDINGLY.  If one rule can be changed than why not another?  If my Florida vote is not counted - ONCE AGAIN - then I see no point in voting anymore, including in November!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt, Belton,TX</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252338</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt, Belton,TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252338</guid>
		<description>So, the big question remains in the air.   Will the super delegates go with the results of the primary elections, i.e., the voters?   Or, will they go the way the ringleaders of the Democratic Party want them to?     In any case, this should be an interesting study into the Party's version of Democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the big question remains in the air.   Will the super delegates go with the results of the primary elections, i.e., the voters?   Or, will they go the way the ringleaders of the Democratic Party want them to?     In any case, this should be an interesting study into the Party&#8217;s version of Democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252331</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252331</guid>
		<description>If the DNC has the resources to hold a "special" June meeting for the super delegates to vote and decide... but they don't have the 5 million to hold the revote in florida???

I'm sure after they pay for the flights and lodging and meals and booze and the resources for the "special" convention.. the cost of it will be in excess of $10 million... that's 795 super delegates!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the DNC has the resources to hold a &#8220;special&#8221; June meeting for the super delegates to vote and decide&#8230; but they don&#8217;t have the 5 million to hold the revote in florida???</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure after they pay for the flights and lodging and meals and booze and the resources for the &#8220;special&#8221; convention.. the cost of it will be in excess of $10 million&#8230; that&#8217;s 795 super delegates!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakesup</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252281</link>
		<dc:creator>snakesup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252281</guid>
		<description>If you want "super delegates" you have to live with them.  shouldn't they vote their conscience?  Would you want somebody demanding that you have to vote a certain way regardless of your convictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want &#8220;super delegates&#8221; you have to live with them.  shouldn&#8217;t they vote their conscience?  Would you want somebody demanding that you have to vote a certain way regardless of your convictions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252271</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252271</guid>
		<description>What they are doing is conspiring to preempt the convention.  It's been going on for a while.  The Obama backers were calling for the election to end in February!  It's ridiculous.  Dean and his cronies at the DNC &#38; Obama blocking 2 states and removing ALL the delgates just adds to the parties silliness. 

People try to blame it on Hillary which is stupid.  She's just trying to run for office and the party has already decided what should happen and are trying everything in their power to over ride the election process.  They stink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they are doing is conspiring to preempt the convention.  It&#8217;s been going on for a while.  The Obama backers were calling for the election to end in February!  It&#8217;s ridiculous.  Dean and his cronies at the DNC &amp; Obama blocking 2 states and removing ALL the delgates just adds to the parties silliness. </p>
<p>People try to blame it on Hillary which is stupid.  She&#8217;s just trying to run for office and the party has already decided what should happen and are trying everything in their power to over ride the election process.  They stink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich (USAF Ret)</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich (USAF Ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252218</guid>
		<description>This will need to be settled in the Democratic National Convention.  I find the idea that the superdelegates should automatically go the way of the majority stupid. If that was the case, why have a minimum number of delegates required to win the nomination. If it is simply the majority of delegates at the start of the convention, as some are saying, then there is no reason to have a required number of delegates. The Superdelegates are not used to simply mirror the popular vote. The Superdelegates should be there to offset some of the emotion of the popular vote and look at who would be the best for the party and for the country. The Superdelegates need to make their decision based on their standards and ideals, not whimp out and simply go with the popular vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will need to be settled in the Democratic National Convention.  I find the idea that the superdelegates should automatically go the way of the majority stupid. If that was the case, why have a minimum number of delegates required to win the nomination. If it is simply the majority of delegates at the start of the convention, as some are saying, then there is no reason to have a required number of delegates. The Superdelegates are not used to simply mirror the popular vote. The Superdelegates should be there to offset some of the emotion of the popular vote and look at who would be the best for the party and for the country. The Superdelegates need to make their decision based on their standards and ideals, not whimp out and simply go with the popular vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252183</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252183</guid>
		<description>It does not matter because I am one of about 33 I can count that know if Clinton is not on the ticket then it is McCain we must vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not matter because I am one of about 33 I can count that know if Clinton is not on the ticket then it is McCain we must vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252128</guid>
		<description>They ought to make the Michigan and Florida delegates into "superdelegates".  Then all the Democrats could fight it out for George Soros's money.  Maybe the Rev Wright could mediate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They ought to make the Michigan and Florida delegates into &#8220;superdelegates&#8221;.  Then all the Democrats could fight it out for George Soros&#8217;s money.  Maybe the Rev Wright could mediate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252077</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252077</guid>
		<description>Barak Obama will win the nomination.  It's a shame that Hillary won't bail out gracefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barak Obama will win the nomination.  It&#8217;s a shame that Hillary won&#8217;t bail out gracefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252074</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252074</guid>
		<description>I am so tired to the dirty Bill/Hillary Clinton politics I can hardly watch Hillary anyone.  Yes, it would be nice to have a qualifed female president but I want one with integrity.

Barack 08, all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired to the dirty Bill/Hillary Clinton politics I can hardly watch Hillary anyone.  Yes, it would be nice to have a qualifed female president but I want one with integrity.</p>
<p>Barack 08, all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Hart</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252063</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252063</guid>
		<description>Alrright start by seating the Florida and Michigan delegates and popular votes OK!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alrright start by seating the Florida and Michigan delegates and popular votes OK!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Real</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252062</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252062</guid>
		<description>Apparently, the dozen or so of Clinton's  "wealthy" donors are trying to pressure Speaker Pelosi.  I also sent an email to Ms Pelosi, asking her to persuade Senator Clinton to drop out now, before the Democratic Party is crippled beyond repair.  I realize that my request means nothing.  I'm merely a middle income, average American and we all know who "really" controls the good old USA.  $$$$$$$

Senator Clinton knows that, no matter what happens in the remaining primaries, she cannot go ahead of Senator Obama.  She is only staying in the race for one of two reasons:  1.  She will try to steal the nomination by false promises to the Superdelgates or 2. She'll keep up the animosity and mud slinging until November, ensuring Mc Cain an easy victory, so that she can run again in 4 years.  She realizes that if Senator Obama should get elected, she'd have to wait 8 years for sure.

The Clintons do NOT know the meaning of truth.  If elected, Senator Clinton would give us another 8 years of deceit and scandals.  Is that what we really want?  No one seems to care about that.   Her husband, with his immoral actions and lies, gave the youth of our country "new rules" and guidelines as to what sexual relations are.  Hillary said she "misspoke".  That's another great signal to our youth.  If you lie and get caught, merely say you "misspoke" and everything will be all right.  Between them, they can shape a whole, new, ugly society in America.

A concerned, average citizen
Peter Real</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, the dozen or so of Clinton&#8217;s  &#8220;wealthy&#8221; donors are trying to pressure Speaker Pelosi.  I also sent an email to Ms Pelosi, asking her to persuade Senator Clinton to drop out now, before the Democratic Party is crippled beyond repair.  I realize that my request means nothing.  I&#8217;m merely a middle income, average American and we all know who &#8220;really&#8221; controls the good old USA.  $$$$$$$</p>
<p>Senator Clinton knows that, no matter what happens in the remaining primaries, she cannot go ahead of Senator Obama.  She is only staying in the race for one of two reasons:  1.  She will try to steal the nomination by false promises to the Superdelgates or 2. She&#8217;ll keep up the animosity and mud slinging until November, ensuring Mc Cain an easy victory, so that she can run again in 4 years.  She realizes that if Senator Obama should get elected, she&#8217;d have to wait 8 years for sure.</p>
<p>The Clintons do NOT know the meaning of truth.  If elected, Senator Clinton would give us another 8 years of deceit and scandals.  Is that what we really want?  No one seems to care about that.   Her husband, with his immoral actions and lies, gave the youth of our country &#8220;new rules&#8221; and guidelines as to what sexual relations are.  Hillary said she &#8220;misspoke&#8221;.  That&#8217;s another great signal to our youth.  If you lie and get caught, merely say you &#8220;misspoke&#8221; and everything will be all right.  Between them, they can shape a whole, new, ugly society in America.</p>
<p>A concerned, average citizen<br />
Peter Real</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252055</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/26/democrats-look-to-superdelegates-for-early-resolution-on-nominee/#comment-252055</guid>
		<description>"Super delegates"what? a bunch of guys to broker peace on who the clear winner is? Please, whoever the people decide through popular vote and delegetes pledged should be the one to carry the dem flag.Dem. should do away with the idea of super delegates after this primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Super delegates&#8221;what? a bunch of guys to broker peace on who the clear winner is? Please, whoever the people decide through popular vote and delegetes pledged should be the one to carry the dem flag.Dem. should do away with the idea of super delegates after this primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.250 seconds -->
