Clinton Backer: Obama Will Probably Win, White Voters Attracted to His ‘Articulate’ Side
WASHINGTON — A congressman backing Hillary Rodham Clinton says white voters are supporting Barack Obama based on the view that he is articulate and his election would allow the nation “to get this boogeyman called race behind us.”
Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, who is black, told Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that Obama “is articulate. In the black tradition, he would probably be mediocre.”
“For White Americans, it’s like, this guy can speak,” Cleaver said in the radio interview. “If you put him on a level with a lot of other African-American public speakers, he may not even measure up.”
But Cleaver also conceded in the interview that he thinks Obama will win the White House.
“If I had to make a prediction right now, I’d say Barack Obama is going to be the next president,” Cleaver told Canadian public radio in an interview first aired on Sunday. “I will be stunned if he’s not the next president of the United States.”
Cleaver has remained a strong supporter of Clinton despite pressure from other black leaders and many of his constituents to switch allegiance to Obama. He was not immediately available on Tuesday to discuss his comments.
Some black members of Congress, such as Georgia Democratic Rep. John Lewis, have changed their allegiance from Clinton to Obama in recent weeks.
In the interview, Cleaver insisted he would not back away from his endorsement of Clinton. He claims much of the support for Obama is driven by a sense that his election will prove the country has solved its problems with race.
“I think for many white Americans, they are looking at Barack Obama and saying ‘This is our chance to demonstrate that we have been able to get this boogeyman called race behind us,”‘ Cleaver said. “And so they are going to vote for him, whether he has credentials or not, whether he has any experience — I think all that’s out the window.”
Yet Cleaver asserts that Obama as president could actually hamper efforts to curb racial injustice. He said future concerns about race “would be met with rejection because we’ve already demonstrated that we’re not a racist nation.”
Cleaver represents a majority white congressional district in Kansas City where Obama won a majority of the vote in Missouri’s presidential primary. He is the only ordained minister in Congress and still preaches every Sunday at his mostly black Kansas City church.
Cleaver said he was “outraged over the outrage” at the controversy over Obama’s former pastor, who was criticized for making racially charged comments in church sermons. Cleaver praised Obama’s Chicago church for having a “long and rich history of being involved in the betterment of the Chicago Black community.”
Last year, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., was criticized when he called Obama “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”
Cleaver compared his continued support for Clinton to his loyalty in rooting for his hometown football team when it plays a better opponent.
“Even though I don’t expect the Kansas City Chiefs to beat the Indianapolis Colts, I cheer for the Kansas City Chiefs,” he said.





Give me a break, you want to talk racist. Cleaver thinks a white woman, as myself, is not smart enough to vote on the issues, not the color of the man. You think I’m going to vote for a black man simply because he is “black”. Not quite. That is such a racist attitude. Why do we have to even “talk” about the fact that he’s black? No one says anything about John McCain being “white”, just old. Another prejudice. I wouldn’t vote for anyone because of the color of their skin. Being offended because someone says you’re “articulate” is ridiculous. He has never been white. People call us articulate from time to time also. I’m offended that this black man thinks as a “white” American, I am not smart enough to vote for someone for reasons other than the color of their skin. Duh!
>>we have been able to get this boogeyman called race behind us
Try being white and saying that. Shouldn’t it be equally stupid for a non-white person? Not as long as there are separate rules.
>>is articulate. In the black tradition, he would probably be mediocre
Oh my. Poor, dumb white people can’t really be good judges of such a thing. “They” (that is, you dumb white folks), are taken only because of guilt, and the pitiful excuse you use isn’t even a good one, because this guy can’t rhyme like Jessie!!
>>Cleaver praised Obama’s Chicago church for having a “long and rich history of being involved in the betterment of the Chicago Black community.”
Well, I have news for you. There is no shortage of people who are not racist, and they hold the same rules for a human being whether they are white or they are black. And the “preacher” made racist comments (as well as hateful comments). I would condemn a white person for acting like that, or having attitudes like that toward black Americans. Well guess what? It is every bit as racist and hateful when a black person does it. Period. Unless, of course, you have to make “special” rules for people because they aren’t “normal.” Wonder who that is? (Oh yeah, and don’t blame me for that definition. It was Bill “the first black president” Clinton who said “BLACK PEOPLE WANT THE SAME THINGS AS NORMAL PEOPLE.” Of course, he is a liberal, so his pandering and condescention are welcome to the black community and little was said of that…
Not this white person, Pal. As for Obama being articulate, so are many other expert Liars and Cheats; this one is an empty shell with a big mouth too!