Obama’s Test: Will Offensive Against Wright Pay Off in the Primaries?

Border

Barack Obama looks on as he is introduced during a town hall-style meeting in Hickory, N.C., Tuesday, shortly after he addressed the controversy over his former pastor at length. (AP Photo)

Barack Obama went on a new offensive against his former pastor Tuesday, calling the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.’s remarks “appalling” and effectively breaking ties with him.

Obama used his strongest language to date to denounce Wright at a time when he’s still struggling to shake Hillary Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary race. Looking ahead to the nine remaining contests, analysts say Obama’s move could either pay dividends for the Illinois senator and douse the Wright controversy — or backfire.

“People are going to say that Barack Obama should have done this a long time ago, but what’s important in a political campaign is that you have done the right thing, and I think most Americans would agree that Barack Obama now has done that,” Democratic strategist Steve Murphy told FOX News.

Obama spoke at length about Wright between campaign stops in North Carolina. He said he was “outraged” by Wright’s remarks the day before at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

“All it was was a bunch of rants that aren’t grounded in truth,” Obama said, putting substantial distance between himself and the pastor, whose sermons put Obama’s campaign in a near-crisis state last month.

The last time Obama addressed the Wright controversy in such detail was March 18 in Philadelphia. But at the time, he said Wright still was “like family” and that he could not disown him. Wright officiated at Obama’s wedding, and one of his sermons was the inspiration for the title of Obama’s book “The Audacity of Hope.”

Obama’s language was much tougher Tuesday, and he repeatedly said Wright wasn’t the same man he had met 20 years ago before joining Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

Former Bill Clinton adviser and columnist Dick Morris said Obama’s stand Tuesday was a “good move,” because Wright continued to threaten his non-racial image as “a guy running for president who happened to be dark-skinned.”

“Wright has become the poster child for everything that white Americans fear in a black politician or pastor,” he said.

But Morris warned that Obama could still be held “hostage” by any member of his church’s congregation who might claim to have seen Obama listening to Wright’s controversial sermons.

Wright attracted criticism for telling his congregation that the government was responsible for afflicting the black community with HIV and for suggesting America provoked the Sept. 11 attacks with its foreign policies.

“Isn’t politics fun?” Morris added. “A couple months ago Obama was trying to prove he wasn’t a Muslim, and now the more he can prove that he doesn’t go to church, the better he’s going to do.”

Another trouble spot for Obama could be that he reacted in large part to what he saw as a personal affront by Wright. Obama said he was “angered” by Wright’s suggestion that he was engaging in political posturing by denouncing his sermons.

“What seems to be most insulting to him was that he was insulted by Rev. Wright, more than the comments that some people see as being unpatriotic,” Democratic strategist Kirsten Powers said.

Conservative critics continued to hammer Obama on Tuesday for staying with the church for nearly two decades, and again questioned whether he was really unaware of Wright’s controversial views before he spoke out on them.

Roll Call Editor Mort Kondracke said Obama now risks more backlash from Wright, thereby prolonging the unwelcome attention.

“It would not do Obama any good if Wright comes back and starts having a fight with Obama,” he said. “I’m not convinced it’s the end of the story.”

Wright has in fact shown a new willingness to take on the media, and to challenge Obama, over the public treatment of his sermons.

Wright, whose remarks first stirred national controversy more than a month ago, broke his silence on the matter Friday in an interview on PBS. He followed up with an appearance at an NAACP dinner in Detroit and then his address Monday before the National Press Club.

There he taunted reporters and claimed the furor over his sermons was an attack on the black church.

Obama disputed that Tuesday and said Wright only caricatured himself.

Even before Wright’s public appearances, the issue was gnawing at Obama’s campaign. At the Philadelphia debate before the Pennsylvania primary, Obama again endured questions about his ties to his former pastor. And the North Carolina GOP produced an ad last week that hit Obama for his relationship with Wright.

It is unclear whether Clinton will raise the Wright issue again before the May 6 primaries in Indiana and North Carolina. As the controversy developed, the New York senator eventually made Wright a point of her campaign, saying she would not have stayed in the church if Wright were her pastor.

It’s also not clear whether Obama is considering leaving his church. He said Tuesday he was still a member, but that his relationship with the church has been strained as a result of the Wright controversy.

“When I go to church it’s not for spectacle. It’s to pray and to find to find a stronger sense of faith. It’s not to posture politically. It’s not to hear things that violate my core beliefs … and I certainly don’t want to provide a distraction to those who are worshiping at Trinity,” he said.

“As of this point I’m a member. I haven’t had a discussion with Reverend [Otis] Moss (the current minister) about it so I can’t tell you how he’s reacting and how he’s responding.”

Click here to read more about Obama’s criticism of Wright.

Click here to read a full transcript of Obama’s press conference Tuesday.

FOX News’ Bonney Kapp contributed to this report.

283 Responses to “Obama’s Test: Will Offensive Against Wright Pay Off in the Primaries?”

Pages: « 29 28 27 [26] 25 24 23 22 21 20 191 » Show All

Comment by Tony From Pa

Everyone is making this issue too complicated ! It’s very simple . O’Bama and Clinton want to be President , and they are willing to say anything , do anything , buy anything , and squash anyone who gets in their way to get there . Old Friends , new friends , relatives , committee people who work for them , ANYONE !!!They would re-structure their Whole lives if they could . Reverand Whright just wants to make as much controversy and MONEY as he can to pay for his new retirement Home.

 
Comment by ahtasham

Obama should severe relations with this monster named “wright” once for all. Wright is still dwelling in the past. The present reality is that the Whites are even aftraid of talking about race in public. Obama certainly a new generation with no reflection on the past. He should make clear to the public that he means what he say about Wright.

 
Comment by Jen in PA

If you want to slam Obama, fine, but don’t defend Hillary while doing so. That’s like slamming Bin Laden while defending Hitler. You democrats (not liberals…there is a difference) got a raw deal this election season.

 
Comment by Ann

I am tired of people saying (to you, Obama Supporter) Why can’t people look past race? Why are people so racist they won’t vote for Obama because he’s black?, and similar questions. So you tell me - why can’t people look past race? Do you think that Obama gets 90% of the black vote consistently because 90% of the black voters agree with everything he says? I don’t think 90% of all white voters are voting for someone white….seems like yes, people do have problems looking past race, but not in the way you implied. I do not base who I vote for, associate with, or like on anything except personality and character, and am sick of people assuming otherwise.

And on another topic, I am also sick of people saying you can’t hold Obama responsible for what Wright says. NO ONE IS DOING THAT. People are holding Obama responsible for not standing up for what is right and saying that racism IN ANY FORM is not acceptable.

 
Comment by shirley axelrod

There is something Hillary cannot do as well as Obama and that is to lie. He is the best at that. His speech yesterday just made me turn against him more. I was for him before I found out who he really is. He is so very bad for our country. Wise up America. Remember the Clintons gave us 8 of the most prosperous years the United States of America has ever known. When They left office we were better than a trillion $ to the good. As a matter of fact they were fighting up there in Washington how to spend it. Now look at us. We owe China 2 trillion and we just got another 161 billion from china to finance these checks we will be getting in the mail in May. And now we want to put a guy in office that has friends like Ayres and Wright and the like. It’s scary.

 
Comment by GoldenChica

Message to Amy: Give it up with the snyper fire, that’s all news girl. The new hype is Rev. Wright.

 
Comment by maggie

Keep talking Wright. Your digging Obama’s hole bigger by the minute

 
Comment by Lyn

I find it interesting that the arena of the church is a potential Achilles heel for Obama’s campaign and could eventually cause its demise. After all, God is in control. He works in mysterious ways. If Obama were to be defeated by Hilary, I can’t imagine a sane America voting for Hilary for president. With an unelectable as the Democratic candidate, a Republican could actually win the presidency in these clearly anti-Republican/anti-war days. Not even the liberal press could save the Democrats! God bless America.

 
Comment by No Obama

I truly think Barak Obama and his Pastor have recently met privately, and decided to stage this ‘falling out’ so he could distance himself further from him for the election. This all seems too contrived, and part of some political playbook to me (call me cynical). Even if it is not, Barak should remove himself from the race as his candidacy is too tainted by this issue, and it will harm the Democratic Party in November. This whole debacle is a complete distraction to the real issues facing America today! I do not believe he agrees with Reverend Wright, but his judgement on this isue definitely calls his ability to lead this nation into question. He says that this elections is not about him, he should prove it!

 
Comment by Emmy

Reverand Wright = The Iceberg
Obama Campaign = The Titanic
BOTH were supposed to be “Unsinkable”

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Delegate Count

Democrats(2,118 needed to win nomination)

Candidates number of delegates
Barack Obama 2206
Hillary Clinton 1906
John Edwards 26
Total 4138

Republicans(1,191 needed to win nomination)

Candidates number of delegates
John McCain 1504
Mike Huckabee 286
Mitt Romney 242
Ron Paul 24
Total 2056
Close
E-mail It